61–70 of 110 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I actually did post on your feedback site nearly a year ago, still no feedback or response on it so far [0]. It's been marked as under review, so it must be one thorough review process. [0] https://kagifeedback.org/d/2565-image-search-doesnt-respect-...
Thanks, replied in the thread.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
If you forget it's not Google, I don't want to sign up. I want something that reminds me all the time that it's not Google, mainly by its ability to actually find the things I search for.
I suppose what they mean is that it's easy to forget that it isn't Google from ten years ago when Google was good?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm a subscriber. But I don't feel like creating a signup for kagifeedback. https://kagi.com/images?q=https%3A%2F%2Fs3.amazonaws.com%2Fp... Lets use this as an example. I would personally like to have a list of exact results. Separately - a list of similar images would maybe be nice. But tbh, 99.99% of the time with reverse image search, I am trying to play detective, not find similar images. I am usually looking to…
> I'm a subscriber. But I don't feel like creating a signup for kagifeedback. It's a separate login? That's really weird, isn't it?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Still, give Kagi a chance. I don't work for them, I don't have friends who work for them, I'm just a guy who uses Kagi and will never look back. It isn't expensive and it's SO worth it.
Switched about ten months ago and it’s been so good I forget it’s even not Google sometimes.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Still, give Kagi a chance. I don't work for them, I don't have friends who work for them, I'm just a guy who uses Kagi and will never look back. It isn't expensive and it's SO worth it.
Switched about ten months ago and it’s been so good I forget it’s even not Google sometimes.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Same, best digital product I’ve spent money on in a long time. It’s an improvement over Google, and well worth the price.
I tried it for two months and it was good, but not that much better that I'd spend $10/mo on it. The results were basically about the same as DDG. I can't really relate to all the praise I see about it. However, I do have to say that, when I was looking for a very specific post, I spent around twenty minutes on Google and DDG and they came back with trash, whereas Kagi found it right away. In that one instance it was…
The quality of all free search is just bad. Kagi, even when it fails, is basically the difference between me looking for something or just giving up and deciding it's not worthwhile. Kagi's not magic-tier like early Google was - it's basically just the only modern web search engine.
Is this incentive for sites to avoid/discourage AI-generated images, to avoid that hurting search rankings?
> By default, Kagi Image Search downranks images from websites with a high proportion of AI-generated content. Is this incentive for sites to avoid/discourage AI-generated images, to avoid that hurting search rankings?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Thanks, replied in the thread.
That's kind of you, but if you have to resort to HN comments as your feedback system, then your existing feedback system doesn't really work, does it?