Earlier quoted context omitted.
The question is if they are impressive for a company worth $3.1 trillion. Annualizing this quarter's earnings it has a P/E of 45. And earnings "only" grew at 60% annualized, slower than in the past. (Revenue growth is also a bit slower as a percentage) So market likely sees decelerating growth which can't justify such a high P/E. e.g. if growth fell to say 30% YOY in a year, nvda would be seen as overvalued today.
> Annualizing this quarter's earnings it has a P/E of 45. And earnings "only" grew at 60% annualized, slower than in the past That's a PEG ratio of 1.5 [1], below the S&P 500's forward 2.63 [2]. (EDIT: It's 1.4x [3].) Wild times. [1] https://www.investopedia.com/terms/p/pegratio.asp [2] https://www.nasdaq.com/market-activity/stocks/spgi/price-ear... [3] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41384923
I'm seeing 17% projected growth in earnings: https://ycharts.com/indicators/sp_500_earnings_per_share_ttm...
P/e is 24. ($493 billion quarterly earnings, $47 trillion market cap). - and yes, nvda is literally alone 6% of sp500 earnings.
Peg is 1.4 as a comparable to the way I calculated Nvidia.