Live data from Hacker News

Taskwarrior – CLI Task Management

taskwarrior.org

61–70 of 72 posts

Re: Taskwarrior – CLI Task Management

#61
post #34

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Just for comparison, I've had a couple crashes in about a year of daily use. Definitely less than IntelliJ or Chrome has crashed, but more than vim.

That's really unfair comparison. IntelliJ and Chrome are more complex piece of software.

With many more people working on them and paid to do so.

Re: Taskwarrior – CLI Task Management

#62

Self plug, I'm developing a minimal gui for Taskwarrior, focused on keyboard navigation. https://github.com/tmahmood/taskwarrior-web/ Task warrior is the my core of task management, as I've ADHD,I lost track of my task if it's not easily visible, this ui helps me with that. It shows timer for active task on the top. Future plan is to integrate time warrior too.

As a fellow ADHDr, I've found that I lose track of the entire task tracking system if it doesn't remind me of its existence. I recently wrapped the taskwarrior CLI with some bash and zenity popups that run on crob jobs to ask me what I'm doing and its proven quite effective at getting me to stay on task and log what I've been doing via timewarrior. Not sure how easy that is to do in a web UI, but if you find a similar struggle, it might be worth a shot.

Re: Taskwarrior – CLI Task Management

#64

Self plug, I'm developing a minimal gui for Taskwarrior, focused on keyboard navigation. https://github.com/tmahmood/taskwarrior-web/ Task warrior is the my core of task management, as I've ADHD,I lost track of my task if it's not easily visible, this ui helps me with that. It shows timer for active task on the top. Future plan is to integrate time warrior too.

Nice! Why not a TUI instead of a Web UI?

Re: Taskwarrior – CLI Task Management

#65

Don't get me wrong, this is probably great software, but there is a big field of tasks like reminder apps, calendar, note taking apps etc. for which I just use a plain free form text editor. I don't quite see what these tools offer, other than pretty user interfaces. And after taking the time to learn the new tools, there will still be cases when I won't have access to them, while plain text works everywhere

For me it's dependencies and automatic urgency ordering. Greys out whatever I can't do yet without actually hiding it, helps decide what's most important to do next, and automatically adjusts all of it when a task is completed.

I did only use a text file before fiddling with those two features and finding they did actually help me. Nowadays I use taskwarrior for anything that will last longer than a day, and a temporary text file for only the things I plan to do that day.

Re: Taskwarrior – CLI Task Management

#66

Don't get me wrong, this is probably great software, but there is a big field of tasks like reminder apps, calendar, note taking apps etc. for which I just use a plain free form text editor. I don't quite see what these tools offer, other than pretty user interfaces. And after taking the time to learn the new tools, there will still be cases when I won't have access to them, while plain text works everywhere

Yes, every time I start using some GUI software, I eventually find myself returning to markdown.

I spend all day editing in VSCode -- it's nice to use the same tool (and vim keys)

Re: Taskwarrior – CLI Task Management

#67
post #60

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Do you know if this is still being actively developed? I looked at it a few months ago and was worried it looked like it was being abandoned.

What made you think that? The changelog lists recent changes: https://community.amazingmarvin.com/changelog

> > I looked at it a few months ago

Depending on when they looked, maybe the big gaps in releases before this year? Did it change ownership or just get more active?

Re: Taskwarrior – CLI Task Management

#68
post #39

Another shameless plug: git-task Task manager or bug tracker that resides right within git repository and can sync with GitHub. It's on a very early stage of development, but somehow works. I'd really appreciate any ideas on what can be done/improved (actually, a lot). https://github.com/jhspetersson/git-task

There were several of these in the early/mid-2010s and all had different drawbacks that made them awkward to deal with. Offhand the only one I remember the name of was BugsEverywhere: https://github.com/aaiyer/bugseverywhere

Some issues I remember in general (not all of these applied to all these distributed bug trackers) that caused them to largely be abandoned:

* No single view of cases: At least one of them was tied to the current commit, so a case could be resolved on a branch but not master

* No central view for non-devs

* Updating happened outside normal git operations so it was easy to forget to push/pull case changes

* One of them that avoided the previous issue made heavy use of branches to keep its data in the main repo, so it turned the repo into a mess

* Even if you did push/pull, updates aren't synchronous with a central location so it was totally possible for two people to assign a case to themselves locally and not realize it until later

Re: Taskwarrior – CLI Task Management

#69

Self plug, I'm developing a minimal gui for Taskwarrior, focused on keyboard navigation. https://github.com/tmahmood/taskwarrior-web/ Task warrior is the my core of task management, as I've ADHD,I lost track of my task if it's not easily visible, this ui helps me with that. It shows timer for active task on the top. Future plan is to integrate time warrior too.

Nice! Why not a TUI instead of a Web UI?

I don't think there's any need for another TUI when we have VIT, I tried to make my UI as par with it in terms of information density, and keyboard access

Re: Taskwarrior – CLI Task Management

#70

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That's really unfair comparison. IntelliJ and Chrome are more complex piece of software.

With many more people working on them and paid to do so.

That's just absurd.

An IDE or a browser have a huge number of failure points.

Just starting up initiates large numbers of complex operations, file I/O, processing, database, graphics, platform specific operations, what not. They are in a way OS of their own.

Comparing a CLI application, that's scope is tiny compared to a full-blown IDE or a browser, is absurd!

Post reply on HN