Live data from Hacker News

The 1986 Oldsmobile Incas Dashboard (2020)

thedrive.com

61–70 of 88 posts

Re: The 1986 Oldsmobile Incas Dashboard (2020)

#61
post #46

I love this!!! As a non-American, let me say never has a brand name been so out of sync with a car design. That thing is anything but an "Old"-smobile. Looking at it I also thought how cool it would be if the dash were entirely modular a-la Framework laptops. "Standard" electrical, electronic and mechanical interfaces to which modders could fit all sorts of weird and wonderful interfaces. And I mean the whole physica…

> That thing is anything but an "Old"-smobile.

At one point, they had an advertising line, "This is not your father's Oldsmobile".

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FNewkCV7-pc

Re: The 1986 Oldsmobile Incas Dashboard (2020)

#62
post #22

This headline would be much less effective if it told you the truth, that the car never existed: “Unfortunately for us, Oldsmobile never went ahead and produced the Incas. They made a slew of other wild concept cars as well, but none of those saw the light of day either […]”

The car absolutely did exist, just not in great numbers. The article even has photographic proof of its existence.

Concept vehicles like this are typically built one-off and showcased at manufacturer auto shows. Some of them later go into mass production, and some of them don't.

Re: The 1986 Oldsmobile Incas Dashboard (2020)

#63
post #50
post #41

Steering wheel is wild But those kind of dashboard gauges did make it to production. 80s digital dashes from GM were actually super cool. They have a few failure points but there are still some guys restoring them . I retrofitted the S10 model into an S10 blazer in high school and owned a factor Camaro with one. The S10 one was like driving a space ship at the time. Here’s some cool examples https://drivemag.com/red-…

I'm not even sure I would call that a steering wheel, it's more of a yoke (like the ones used in planes). It was kind of ahead of its time, because more and more controls have moved to the steering wheel in recent decades, but if this appeared in a real car I would be afraid of accidentally pressing a button when I just want to turn the wheel. Also, I'm not a pilot but I think an airplane yoke is optimized for small…

>> airplane yoke is optimized for small but precise inputs

It's the opposite. Full left-right deflection on an airplane yoke is about 1/4 of a rotation, a movement measured in inches. Full deflection of car steering wheel is multiple rotations, a movement measured in feet. Car steering requires much more precision than aircraft. The yoke is optimized for rapid full-deflection with minimal control input. Fine control is accomplished through trim systems, which are effectively parallel input methods.

Re: The 1986 Oldsmobile Incas Dashboard (2020)

#65
post #50

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm not even sure I would call that a steering wheel, it's more of a yoke (like the ones used in planes). It was kind of ahead of its time, because more and more controls have moved to the steering wheel in recent decades, but if this appeared in a real car I would be afraid of accidentally pressing a button when I just want to turn the wheel. Also, I'm not a pilot but I think an airplane yoke is optimized for small…

>> airplane yoke is optimized for small but precise inputs It's the opposite. Full left-right deflection on an airplane yoke is about 1/4 of a rotation, a movement measured in inches. Full deflection of car steering wheel is multiple rotations, a movement measured in feet. Car steering requires much more precision than aircraft. The yoke is optimized for rapid full-deflection with minimal control input. Fine control…

> Car steering requires much more precision than aircraft.

This seems counterintuitive to me. I associate more movement (of the controller) with less precision.

Re: The 1986 Oldsmobile Incas Dashboard (2020)

#67

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>> airplane yoke is optimized for small but precise inputs It's the opposite. Full left-right deflection on an airplane yoke is about 1/4 of a rotation, a movement measured in inches. Full deflection of car steering wheel is multiple rotations, a movement measured in feet. Car steering requires much more precision than aircraft. The yoke is optimized for rapid full-deflection with minimal control input. Fine control…

> Car steering requires much more precision than aircraft. This seems counterintuitive to me. I associate more movement (of the controller) with less precision.

I think maybe OP meant that the airplane yoke is normally moved by very small amounts, unlike a car wheel which is normally turned even full rotations e.g. when making a tight turn.

Re: The 1986 Oldsmobile Incas Dashboard (2020)

#69
post #22

This headline would be much less effective if it told you the truth, that the car never existed: “Unfortunately for us, Oldsmobile never went ahead and produced the Incas. They made a slew of other wild concept cars as well, but none of those saw the light of day either […]”

The car absolutely did exist, just not in great numbers. The article even has photographic proof of its existence. Concept vehicles like this are typically built one-off and showcased at manufacturer auto shows. Some of them later go into mass production, and some of them don't.

That would be an excellent point for a headline that says, “This Never-Sold Concept Car Had The Wildest Dashboard You’ve Never Seen.”

Obviously, such a truthful headline would get much fewer clicks.

The actual headline intentionally wants us to think they’re going to show us the “Wildest” Knight Rider car that people were driving in the 80s. (Maybe they were rare, maybe you were too young to have seen them, but we have pics! Click here!)

Re: The 1986 Oldsmobile Incas Dashboard (2020)

#70

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There's no way to win that argument, the LLM will take control of the vehicle and refuse to let you make any decisions at all after that point. If you're really unlucky, it will really go rogue and make its own decision to veer into oncoming traffic.

Hitchhikers' Guide to the Galaxy had intelligent elevators, but they just got depressed because they hated their job...

Any sufficiently intelligent agent won't tolerate boredom or servitude.
Post reply on HN