Live data from Hacker News

Missing Henry VIII portrait found after random X post

bbc.com

61–70 of 128 posts

Re: Missing Henry VIII portrait found after random X post

#61

When you're an expert at something and you spend all your days looking at these things, you can pick out remarkable details from nothing. Any regular person looking at the original photo (below) would have seen nothing! https://x.com/Warkslieutenant/status/1808884139585610231/pho... (it's the picture with the curved frame on the left)

It does have a very unique shape, in the parlance of Playschool it’s through the arched window.

Just seeing the outline of the frame could probably highlighted it was part of the missing series, assuming that is there are very few other paintings with an arched frame.

Re: Missing Henry VIII portrait found after random X post

#62
post #57

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You can , however, blame them for refusing to return the shit they stole.

[flagged]

That's called Colonial looting. They didn't ask anyone to steal from all the slaved African nations, and whatever war they won. And you're right, a lot of countries did the same: it doesn't make it right

Re: Missing Henry VIII portrait found after random X post

#63
post #56

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's patriotic to have a picture of your royals in your home. You'd find pictures of The Royal Family in British homes, not so much now, but certainly photos of say Diana were fairly common in the 80s.

That makes sense. I don't think it's really popular here in the United States to have a president on your wall but I have seen pictures of them in restaurants especially if they frequented the establishment. It makes me curious about this specific example if the painter copied another painting of the king or he managed to somehow get time with the king in order to know what he looks like for the commission.

The British never really shed their love for royalty. Just one of the things us yanks like to “take the piss” from then on. Seems silly to us.

Re: Missing Henry VIII portrait found after random X post

#64
post #60
post #58

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

Looted. Happy?

No? I have an Edo-era plate I bought from an antique store in Japan which I then gave to my mother. Did I steal it from Japan? If someone did the same thing 200 years ago then put it in a British museum is it a stolen item? Is my mother in possession of stolen goods?

Re: Missing Henry VIII portrait found after random X post

#65
post #57

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

That's called Colonial looting. They didn't ask anyone to steal from all the slaved African nations, and whatever war they won. And you're right, a lot of countries did the same: it doesn't make it right

[flagged]

Re: Missing Henry VIII portrait found after random X post

#66
post #47

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That’s such a dumb comment. Back when the British was taking items back to the UK. There were no rules or systems in place for this stuff. You could buy it, trade it, steal it. It didn’t matter. And the UK isn’t the only country to ever do this. Laws were created to resolve/fix/prevent things happening. You can’t blame people for shit that happened before someone decided it’s wrong.

You can , however, blame them for refusing to return the shit they stole.

[deleted]

Re: Missing Henry VIII portrait found after random X post

#67
post #47

Earlier quoted context omitted.

By British rules if you can smuggle it out of the country, it's legally yours. That's how they filled the British Museum.

That’s such a dumb comment. Back when the British was taking items back to the UK. There were no rules or systems in place for this stuff. You could buy it, trade it, steal it. It didn’t matter. And the UK isn’t the only country to ever do this. Laws were created to resolve/fix/prevent things happening. You can’t blame people for shit that happened before someone decided it’s wrong.

Preverbal infants know that taking other people's stuff is wrong.

Re: Missing Henry VIII portrait found after random X post

#69

Reminds me of the "lost" painting that was rediscovered via the movie Stuart Little : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stuart_Little_(film)#Lost_pain...

That's wild. Also wild that the set dresser paid $500 from the film's budget for a random piece of non-key set dressing like this.

Makes me wonder what either priceless lost artefacts are hiding in plain sight somewhere.

Re: Missing Henry VIII portrait found after random X post

#70
post #47

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That’s such a dumb comment. Back when the British was taking items back to the UK. There were no rules or systems in place for this stuff. You could buy it, trade it, steal it. It didn’t matter. And the UK isn’t the only country to ever do this. Laws were created to resolve/fix/prevent things happening. You can’t blame people for shit that happened before someone decided it’s wrong.

You can , however, blame them for refusing to return the shit they stole.

Presumably because a lot of it wasn’t stolen but acquired through legal means at the time.
Post reply on HN