Live data from Hacker News

Ilya Sutskever: “If you learn all of these, you’ll know 90% of what matters”

reddit.com

61–70 of 117 posts

Re: Ilya Sutskever: “If you learn all of these, you’ll know 90% of what matters”

#61

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Reportedly, Carmack did it an a week by locking himself in an hotel room

How hard can it be? It's only 30 papers. Maybe someone should ask Chuck Norris how long it took him. Who wants to go first?

Chuck Norris ghostwrote those papers while on a motorcycle tour of Brazil.

Re: Ilya Sutskever: “If you learn all of these, you’ll know 90% of what matters”

#62
post #53

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Got a source on that? I know that they were married for 25 years. That's a lot of time for people to change and for differences between their needs and wants to grow. I can say that he is exactly where he wants to be professionally, and I don't think you're suggesting that taking a week out of a year to learn new things is too risky because your wife might leave you.

[flagged]

I've found that the many of the relationships I'm most proud to have in my life are with those who had a reputation for being difficult and/or insufferable.

Re: Ilya Sutskever: “If you learn all of these, you’ll know 90% of what matters”

#63
post #58

How long does it take to learn the prerequisites to learn these if you don't already have a CS background? Reading through the list, I can barely parse half the titles due to acronyms and terms I've never seen before. Would I be able to figure them out along the way? Or is there a body of knowledge this is assuming I should already have? (This isn't a criticism of the list, or even the idea of presenting such a list…

https://www.scottaaronson.com/democritus/ (dead tree form: https://www.amazon.ca/Quantum-Computing-since-Democritus-Aar...) is a soft'ish introduction to much useful background.

Re: Ilya Sutskever: “If you learn all of these, you’ll know 90% of what matters”

#64
post #57

On the related subject: any way to filter out anything AI/LLM related from HN ?

Write a chrome extension that prompts a LLM/uses a custom trained (BERT based) text classification model to filter the posts.

https://github.com/thomasj02/AiFilter

https://github.com/GoogleChrome/chrome-extensions-samples

https://huggingface.co/docs/transformers/en/tasks/sequence_c...

Re: Ilya Sutskever: “If you learn all of these, you’ll know 90% of what matters”

#65

Just learn 30 papers

Or keep doom scrolling some other shit. Your choice. At least this is relevant information for people who are actually interested.

You mean for those who will just add it into their bookmark pile. You could have started yesterday and built a NN from scratch if you were truly interested.

Re: Ilya Sutskever: “If you learn all of these, you’ll know 90% of what matters”

#66
post #9

Would be nice if someone put those into an llm and generate a single coherent document with all the essential knowledge.

That's... pretty much what an LLM is. Dive in, and when you get stuck, ask questions in Claude 3 or ChatGPT4.

Re: Ilya Sutskever: “If you learn all of these, you’ll know 90% of what matters”

#67
post #62
post #53

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

I've found that the many of the relationships I'm most proud to have in my life are with those who had a reputation for being difficult and/or insufferable.

I think about it as a zero sum game: it seems impossible for someone to be stronger in some ways without being weaker in others.

Sometimes, with people who care to do so, they can work on those weaknesses and find ways to limit their impacts on themselves and others.

But everything comes at a cost.

Takeaway: if at least some of your friends aren't difficult in some ways, you're missing out on a lot.

Re: Ilya Sutskever: “If you learn all of these, you’ll know 90% of what matters”

#68
post #62
post #53

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

I've found that the many of the relationships I'm most proud to have in my life are with those who had a reputation for being difficult and/or insufferable.

Weird flex but ok. I think though that there is some merit in being able to communicate with a difficult or insufferable person but I find no merit can exist in choosing to take pride in regularly willingly doing so.

Re: Ilya Sutskever: “If you learn all of these, you’ll know 90% of what matters”

#69
post #46

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What a strangely narrow way of looking at this. Work isn’t the only responsibility. What is the correlation between taking a week away from responsibilities - work, family, etc. - and job satisfaction?

If one cannot disappear for a week to think or study he is putting himself at some serious life disadvantage. My 2c. I do not mean telling family that I am disappearing for a week starting tomorrow, but that I want to disappear for a week in a couple of months and the family would cover responsibilities for me (I should be willing to reciprocate).

Realistically most people just don't have the resources for this sort of thing. It's not necessarily a matter of want but a limitation of needs. Assuming one has a family that could cover, they would still have a job with responsibilities. Not everyone can afford to risk termination or go without a paycheck for a week even if it's the most intelligent option.

Re: Ilya Sutskever: “If you learn all of these, you’ll know 90% of what matters”

#70
post #15

The headline belies the scope of this task. If you click in to see what these are: - one is a full course in convolutional neural networks https://cs231n.github.io/ - one is a 500 page text book https://www.lirmm.fr/~ashen/kolmbook-eng-scan.pdf - another one is an 80 page text book (?) https://arxiv.org/pdf/math/0406077 and so on. I would guess it is possible to go through this list if you make it your full time job…

Reportedly, Carmack did it an a week by locking himself in an hotel room

If he really did it in a week, why hasn't anything come out of his AGI startup yet, two years later? Maybe it wasn't as easy as he seemed to imply, despite his towering intellect.

Anyone can read an absurd amount of text in a week. To absorb and understand it all is a different matter entirely.

Seems more likely to me that Carmack simply convinced himself he'd understood it all. He does seem to think very highly of himself.

Post reply on HN