61–67 of 67 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Gotta wonder why you'd even develop that. This thing seems to have essentially no value for for anyone but bad actors?
Imagine: you’re abducted, but manage to sneak a photo and upload it somewhere completely random with a message for help. You don’t even know where you are.
At the risk of sounding stereotypically skeptical, how do we know there's not a person behind the AI curtain, geo-guessing?
Does it matter? If this is something that can now be done cheaply then the effects of that are much the same whether it's an AI or not.
At the risk of sounding stereotypically skeptical, how do we know there's not a person behind the AI curtain, geo-guessing?
How well would it work if the scenery is not from a road mapped by Google Street View? Like in, the actual nature?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Satellite view? This is about street-level photos… I don't think you would mix these two things in the same model, it'd just dilute the capabilities on both.
> I don't think you would mix these two things in the same model, it'd just dilute the capabilities on both. I'm not sure. Isn't the consensus that neural networks get better, if you make them bigger and give them harder problems?
I mean… maybe… but that also makes them more expensive to run…
Some of them (pictures of a small town beach) were described as:
"The photo was taken from a boat in the XYZ Harbour, looking towards the city of . The distinctive shape of the Tower can be seen in the background. The ferry terminal is also visible on the left side of the photo."
needless to say, the tiny town in question is about 300km from the city mentioned, it does not have a single tower (I think it may be looking at a traffic pole?), and does not have a ferry terminal (there was a boat in the picture).