Live data from Hacker News

Lego price per part over the years

brickinsights.com

61–70 of 179 posts

Re: Lego price per part over the years

#61

Top tip. Buy used Lego cheap from ebay (or similar) and stick it in the dishwasher in a string bag. Try to avoid Lego from a smoker's house or that has been heavily gnawed. And keep the dishwasher heat low, unless you want Salvador Dali Lego.

Hotter tip - if you live near a Goodwill auction site, you can pickup "in store" and so you can bid for their bulk Lego without shipping.

Re: Lego price per part over the years

#62

Someone should figure out how to quantify how “creative potential” a piece has so you can measure how reusable pieces in a set will be for building unique things.

I suspect you could do something quick and dirty with "connectors" - a 1x1 brick would have two connectors, a 2x4 brick would have 16.

Apply some form of modulo by piece count (8 1x1 bricks are more "creative" than a single 2x4) and you'd be close.

Re: Lego price per part over the years

#63

Lego is a plastics company; they're trying to become net-zero, but, unfortunately, being a plastics company, this is extremely hard: https://www.ft.com/content/6cad1883-f87a-471d-9688-c1a3c5a0b...

> The world’s largest toymaker announced two years ago that it had tested a prototype brick made of recycled plastic bottles rather than oil-based ABS, currently used in about 80 per cent of the billions of pieces it makes each year. However, Niels Christiansen, chief executive of the family-owned Danish group, told the Financial Times that using recycled polyethylene terephthalate (RPET) would have led to higher carbon emissions over the product’s lifetime as it would have required new equipment.

I just thought that particular issue around new equipment was interesting.

Re: Lego price per part over the years

#65
post #10

Earlier quoted context omitted.

exactly, that's been my concern as well - more and more parts now are very specialized and hard to reuse in other projects. Makes me sad for the kids - this limits creativity...

So buy Lego Classic. They're not like 80s-era simplicity, but they definitely reuse peices. They're not rare; they're on every shelf. (But they're not Harry Potter, Star Wars, etc.)

But they're not Harry Potter, Star Wars, etc.

Isn't the point of Lego that every set can be Harry Potter, or Star Wars, or whatever you want?

/Haven't Legoed in 45 years, but have fond memories.

Re: Lego price per part over the years

#66
I didn't see any mention in the cost of licensing impacting the price of sets. That's a huge factor. Kits from Lego's own IP such as Ninjago, etc can offer a better PPP value because they aren't cutting in Disney or some other media brand.

Re: Lego price per part over the years

#67
post #10
post #6

Another factor is that Lego is using more greebling than in the past. So you have more "parts", but they're all small pieces used for detailing rather than larger structural components of the build.

exactly, that's been my concern as well - more and more parts now are very specialized and hard to reuse in other projects. Makes me sad for the kids - this limits creativity...

Do you have some example? My kid uses "popcorn" parts to make chimney smoke, he uses "wolfverine claws" to make thatch roofs. Yes there are more parts created all the time, but you can still use them in very creative ways.

Re: Lego price per part over the years

#68

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How many sets do you buy per year, out of curiosity? I got into Lego during the pandemic and bought around 50 sets in the past three years. Over that sample, the number of missing pieces was precisely zero.

I've also always questioned this. I have purchased about 60 sets in the past 4 years. I have a friend who has purchased well over 100 (he runs a Lego YouTube channel - he spends > $6,000 a year on Lego by his estimation). I have never had a missing piece. There have been two times when I thought I was missing a piece and then found it stuck in a bag or hidden under another piece. I've never had to write to Lego to ge…

[deleted]

Re: Lego price per part over the years

#69

I made a script last year that scraped LEGO pricing data from their website. Besides finding out that the Bugatti Bolide Technic set is a pretty good deal as a parts bag, I found that there's only a weak correlation between set size and PPP. The Dots sets throw a wrench in things, of course, and large Technic sets often have expensive electronic and pneumatic parts that must be considered. My conclusion was that PPP…

Epic! thank you!

I loved going to Valley Faire Mall in San Jose and scooping parts by the pound.

I didnt see any of the lego store by-the-pound model.

An interesting method for sus-ing up what parts they had would be looking into the shipments to-from lego entities in NL and USA - sea shipping bills of lading can be found on import yeti (now obviously unless someone has digitized historic bills of lading, etc (and we all know that ship hands (pirates) and long-shoremen (mob) have famously been the definition of corruption - so we can hardly ever trust any bill of lading...

So with that in mind though:

Lets look at the shipments of LEGO https://i.imgur.com/HgLlBuF.png

Nathan appears to be a top importer of Lego https://i.imgur.com/xYDvko5.png

Ships mostly a container a month to LA. https://i.imgur.com/7ZALaMi.png

LegoLand is his customer: https://i.imgur.com/I0oS1wu.png

--

But I cant find out contents of shipment .... AH Check this out: https://i.imgur.com/7CjqVBW.png

So you can see that they are ~1,000 lbs per shipment... rounding up - then remove ~30% for weight of packaging and basically you have 750 pounds of plastic bricks - then apply part existance probability and you can see how much of each part is being imported and a costing idea...

We could probably map out all lego sets and shipments with some dilligence.

Should also look at the environmental impact of lego long term. its a LOT of plastic.

Re: Lego price per part over the years

#70
post #44

Is it just me or does the data aspect of the site feel horribly designed? E.g, the main graph is hard to read since most of the data points are in the $0.10/part range but the graph's y-axis is overwhelmed by the right side with it's $3.11/part train set. And if I click on that, https://brickinsights.com/sets/categories/26 shows 4 data points and it's overwhelmed by a single outlier from 1991. And the time-sequence c…

Of course very few people are experts in visual display of data, but this one is so horribly bad. Log scale please? The title of the post should be a simple chart, and there are charts on the page, but it's completely impossible to get the useful data out of the charts. Sheesh.
Post reply on HN