61–70 of 111 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
Hackers love to question the truth but refuse to countenance bullshit. The downvotes here seem to be catching bullshit quite well!
But ignoring high quality criticism is not going to lead you to truth.
I’m afraid on this topic people feel justified in disregarding or it makes them uncomfortable to scrutinize what they did or said.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> What makes an mRNA vaccine more appealing than a protein-based one? Having worked on the same targeting mechanisms for protein based vaccines meant to be personalized cancer therapies, and having followed the mRNA vaccines with envy, the benefits are absolutely massive. But there's not a single alternative. In comparison to each type: Short peptides injection are worse because: minimal immune stimulation, less of a…
> Short peptides injection are worse because: minimal immune stimulation, less of a mechanism to train the immune system on the peptide targets, have not been effective. If the problem of peptide vaccines is weak immune stimulation, then wouldn't the problem of mRNA vaccines be autoimmunity?
> Why are mRNA vaccines the future? This may well be true, but I’ll be far more likely to believe it when there’s an mRNA vaccine that’s anywhere near as effective as the best old boring vaccines. (I admit that my personal favorite, not-mRNA, HSV vaccine candidate is from a company, X-vax, that appears to have forgotten to renew its domain.) I’m also not entirely clear about the path by which mRNA technology might el…
The covid mRNA vaccines were wildly effective at the original covid strain—95%. But respiratory viruses mutate like crazy.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Hackers love to question the truth but refuse to countenance bullshit. The downvotes here seem to be catching bullshit quite well!
If it’s low quality/troll posts then I agree. But ignoring high quality criticism is not going to lead you to truth. I’m afraid on this topic people feel justified in disregarding or it makes them uncomfortable to scrutinize what they did or said.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
The covid mRNA vaccines were wildly effective at the original covid strain—95%. But respiratory viruses mutate like crazy.
They were wildly effective for a few months after being given. We don’t know how well they would continue to work in the absence of mutation. But it’s worse than that: the revised vaccines appear to be nowhere near as effective even against strains closely related to those which they target. As a somewhat plausible mechanism, repeated doses have been shown to induce IgG4 production, which non-mRNA vaccines don’t seem…
Edit: not to say there's no "positive" effect on the total death rate (i.e. the vaccine causes there to be less deaths overall), it's just not a cost effective positive effect considered in isolation.
This is Jake Seliger ('jseliger)'s partner, if you're wondering.
I'm an ER doctor, writer, and wife to Jake Seliger (JakeSeliger.com)
who is dying of squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue
This comment section is being heavily censored even for very mild criticisms.
Scary to see this censorship still goes on, even now, at this latter stage, where the studies on myocarditis are numerous and no longer debunked. The censorship was even worse during the initial rollout of mRNA technology, blocking fair scrutiny of a widespread rollout. Proper scientific scrutiny and debate is vital around novel technologies. Particularly novel MEDICAL technologies. And particularly where governments…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
The covid mRNA vaccines were wildly effective at the original covid strain—95%. But respiratory viruses mutate like crazy.
They were wildly effective for a few months after being given. We don’t know how well they would continue to work in the absence of mutation. But it’s worse than that: the revised vaccines appear to be nowhere near as effective even against strains closely related to those which they target. As a somewhat plausible mechanism, repeated doses have been shown to induce IgG4 production, which non-mRNA vaccines don’t seem…
Measless and chickenpox are very stable, and even the body gains inmunity for life just being exposed to it in the childhood.
All of them are virus the same way an ant and a elephant are animals. You might kill the ant with a magnifying glass, but good luck trying with th elephant.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Scary to see this censorship still goes on, even now, at this latter stage, where the studies on myocarditis are numerous and no longer debunked. The censorship was even worse during the initial rollout of mRNA technology, blocking fair scrutiny of a widespread rollout. Proper scientific scrutiny and debate is vital around novel technologies. Particularly novel MEDICAL technologies. And particularly where governments…
I think the world will be just fine if a few mediocre coders have their medical hot takes downvoted on an online forum.
Unfortunately you can’t see how mild these “hot takes” are.