Earlier quoted context omitted.
The future is probably mediocre. Things that are "good enough" replace real craftsmanship.
Except where it is needed the most. I doubt you’ll get a fusion reactor running with sloppy craftsmanship. I install heavy machinery for a living. The devices I install simply won’t work unless I do it near perfect.
Scientists aghast at AI rat with genitals in peer-reviewed article
61–68 of 68 posts
Re: Scientists aghast at AI rat with genitals in peer-reviewed article
#62Re: Scientists aghast at AI rat with genitals in peer-reviewed article
#63Earlier quoted context omitted.
Great, I can't wait for appliances that stuxnet themselves shortly after their warranty period. New home automation hack: have your pi-hole pull double duty by running a local, pirate NTP server that forever makes the appliances think they're only a year old.
GE washing machines did exactly that.
Re: Scientists aghast at AI rat with genitals in peer-reviewed article
#64Earlier quoted context omitted.
This has not been my experience with any of the promotion committees I've been on. But Frontiers has been off my list since Frontiers in Public Health published a number of AIDS denialism papers. And yeah, every figure in this paper is nonsensical garbage.
Is the text garbage as well? I don't have any knowledge of the subject area.
Re: Scientists aghast at AI rat with genitals in peer-reviewed article
#65One of the things that worry me the most about AI is that it enables some of the most sloppiest and laziest operators to become even more sloppy and lazy.
The future is probably mediocre. Things that are "good enough" replace real craftsmanship.
Re: Scientists aghast at AI rat with genitals in peer-reviewed article
#66Earlier quoted context omitted.
Let's not forget that OpenAI has probably scraped that POS paper and added it to ChatGPT. Someone should ask it what "iollotte sserotgomar" is. Also Note on the Mission Statement: "Frontiers follows the guidelines and best practice recommendations published by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Authors should refer to the author guidelines for full details. Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology is memb…
I wonder what happens when the majority of the Internet is bullshit generated by LLMs (which can't be long, surely), which is then used to train the latest LLMs. Will we pass an LLM bullshit horizon where the entire Internet becomes "iollotte sserotgomar" and it's brethren?
Re: Scientists aghast at AI rat with genitals in peer-reviewed article
#67Earlier quoted context omitted.
Let's not forget that OpenAI has probably scraped that POS paper and added it to ChatGPT. Someone should ask it what "iollotte sserotgomar" is. Also Note on the Mission Statement: "Frontiers follows the guidelines and best practice recommendations published by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Authors should refer to the author guidelines for full details. Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology is memb…
I wonder what happens when the majority of the Internet is bullshit generated by LLMs (which can't be long, surely), which is then used to train the latest LLMs. Will we pass an LLM bullshit horizon where the entire Internet becomes "iollotte sserotgomar" and it's brethren?
Re: Scientists aghast at AI rat with genitals in peer-reviewed article
#68Earlier quoted context omitted.
I wonder what happens when the majority of the Internet is bullshit generated by LLMs (which can't be long, surely), which is then used to train the latest LLMs. Will we pass an LLM bullshit horizon where the entire Internet becomes "iollotte sserotgomar" and it's brethren?
I guess that's the "singularity" we've been told about - when the amount of bullshit is so massive that it completely overwhelms any attempts at making sense of anything online or find anything.