Live data from Hacker News

ChatGPT for Teams

openai.com

61–70 of 453 posts

Re: ChatGPT for Teams

#61
post #42

A major change is that you cannot opt out from having your conversations used for training unless you are usig a team account which is pretty costly for a single person.

According to this, you can still opt out of training, but you have to turn off history: https://help.openai.com/en/articles/7730893-data-controls-fa...

Re: ChatGPT for Teams

#63
post #59

100 messages / 3 hrs, with a 32k context window. That's really cost effective and efficient for my use case! Does anyone know if this applies to voice conversations? This is me while I'm driving: upload big PDF -> talk to GPT: "Ok, read to me the study/book/article word for word." Good job OpenAI.

I'm confused -- wasn't ChatGPT upgraded to 128k tokens at their last release? Or was that just the API?

Just the API.

Re: ChatGPT for Teams

#64
post #42

A major change is that you cannot opt out from having your conversations used for training unless you are usig a team account which is pretty costly for a single person.

According to this, you can still opt out of training, but you have to turn off history: https://help.openai.com/en/articles/7730893-data-controls-fa...

[deleted]

Re: ChatGPT for Teams

#66
I’ve got my stuff rigged to hit mixtral-8x7, and dolphin locally, and 3.5-turbo, and the 4-series preview all with easy comparison in emacs and stuff, and in fairness the 4.5-preview is starting to show some edge on 8x7 that had been a toss-up even two weeks ago. I’m still on the mistral-medium waiting list.

Until I realized Perplexity will give you a decent amount of Mistral Medium for free through their partnership.

Who is sama kidding they’re still leading here? Mistral Medium destroys the 4.5 preview. And Perplexity wouldn’t be giving it away in any quantity if it had a cost structure like 4.5, Mistral hasn’t raised enough.

Speculation is risky but fuck it: Mistral is the new “RenTech of AI”, DPO and Alibi and sliding window and modern mixtures are well-understood so the money is in the lag between some new edge and TheBloke having it quantized for a Mac Mini or 4070 Super, and the enterprise didn’t love the weird structure, remembers how much fun it was to be over a barrel to MSFT, and can afford to dabble until it’s affordable and operable on-premise.

“Hate to see you go, love to watch you leave”.

Re: ChatGPT for Teams

#68
Did anyone evaluate this compared to using api access through an external gui (i.e. continue.dev). For software dev did the cost end up higher? I am thinking this is can be more convenient (and I suppose engineers can more easily use it outside work as a perk). Given practical use across a team will vary you get a lower price when using api and perhaps additional opportunity for scripted use.

Re: ChatGPT for Teams

#69

I thought teams would be cheaper than individual.

Have you ever seen an enterprise plan cheaper than the individual plans (Which are often free)?

Now normal software is priced to squeeze as much money as you can, enterprises can afford more, so are charged more. Individuals are highly price sensitive, so has to be very cheap.

GenAI is quite different in that its not 0 marginal cost, the marginal costs are probably at least 50% of the price. So the price difference between enterprise and individual plans will be far smaller than usual, due to the common cost base.

Post reply on HN