My usage with browsing is not relevant for this. I don't want to "chat" with my browsin g history. I would simply love my browser would index my bookmarks on my OS so I could search the actual content of those bookmarks. The feedback loop coming gained from chatgtp will I assume always be way better than my local gpt equivalent. But often I bookmark pages where I know the information on there are important enough for…
MemoryCache: Augmenting local AI with browser data
61–70 of 108 posts
Re: MemoryCache: Augmenting local AI with browser data
#62Was just talking about this on reddit like two days ago Instead of data going to models, we need models come to our data which is stored locally and stay locally. While there are many OSS for Loading personal data, they dont do images or videos. In the future everyone may get their own Model but for now tech is there but product/OSS is missing for everyone to get their own QLORA or RAG or Summarizer. Not just message…
Local compute is so 80s, when people moved away from dumb terminals and mainframes, to PCs.
Re: MemoryCache: Augmenting local AI with browser data
#63Was just talking about this on reddit like two days ago Instead of data going to models, we need models come to our data which is stored locally and stay locally. While there are many OSS for Loading personal data, they dont do images or videos. In the future everyone may get their own Model but for now tech is there but product/OSS is missing for everyone to get their own QLORA or RAG or Summarizer. Not just message…
We are building this over at https://software.inc! We collect data about you (from your computer and the internet) into a local database and then teach models how to use it. The models can either be local or cloud-based, and we can route requests based on the sensitivity of the data or the capabilities needed.
We're also hiring if that sounds interesting!
Re: MemoryCache: Augmenting local AI with browser data
#64Was just talking about this on reddit like two days ago Instead of data going to models, we need models come to our data which is stored locally and stay locally. While there are many OSS for Loading personal data, they dont do images or videos. In the future everyone may get their own Model but for now tech is there but product/OSS is missing for everyone to get their own QLORA or RAG or Summarizer. Not just message…
I assume that training LLMs locally require high-end hardware. Even running a model requires a decent CPU or, even better, a high end GPU, but it is not so expensive as training a model. And usually you have to use hardware that is available on the cloud, so not much of privacy here.
Re: MemoryCache: Augmenting local AI with browser data
#65Regarding PrivateGPT, if I have a 12GB Nvidia 4070 and an 11GB 2080ti, which LLM should I run? Edited to add: https://www.choosellm.com/ by the PrivateGPT folks seems to have what I needed.
There's a big community discussing exactly that over at https://www.reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/ .
Re: MemoryCache: Augmenting local AI with browser data
#66What is happening at Firefox is quite strange. Like they are walking backwards.
It's important that we have Firefox working on such experiments otherwise as Google adds more of their privacy invading features to chrome / chromium it will likely impact negatively on peoples desire to find alternative browsers.
Re: MemoryCache: Augmenting local AI with browser data
#67Was just talking about this on reddit like two days ago Instead of data going to models, we need models come to our data which is stored locally and stay locally. While there are many OSS for Loading personal data, they dont do images or videos. In the future everyone may get their own Model but for now tech is there but product/OSS is missing for everyone to get their own QLORA or RAG or Summarizer. Not just message…
Local compute is so 80s, when people moved away from dumb terminals and mainframes, to PCs.
Turns out this sort of stuff is cyclical.
Re: MemoryCache: Augmenting local AI with browser data
#68What is happening at Firefox is quite strange. Like they are walking backwards.
This seems like a sensible step in the right direction IMO, (optional) features such as local, privacy respecting LLMs will help to augment peoples online research, bookmarking, contextual search etc.... It's important that we have Firefox working on such experiments otherwise as Google adds more of their privacy invading features to chrome / chromium it will likely impact negatively on peoples desire to find alterna…
Re: MemoryCache: Augmenting local AI with browser data
#69Was just talking about this on reddit like two days ago Instead of data going to models, we need models come to our data which is stored locally and stay locally. While there are many OSS for Loading personal data, they dont do images or videos. In the future everyone may get their own Model but for now tech is there but product/OSS is missing for everyone to get their own QLORA or RAG or Summarizer. Not just message…
> Instead of data going to models, we need models come to our data which is stored locally and stay locally. We are building this over at https://software.inc ! We collect data about you (from your computer and the internet) into a local database and then teach models how to use it. The models can either be local or cloud-based, and we can route requests based on the sensitivity of the data or the capabilities needed…