Live data from Hacker News

Stop Reading News (2013)

fs.blog

61–63 of 63 posts

Re: Stop Reading News (2013)

#61

Nassim Taleb, in his incerto, makes the argument that: - Most news is actually entertainment disguised as information. - You can't act on the vast majority of news. - Most medias, including specialized ones, can give a very good appearance of competence while actually knowing nothing of the actual situation. - Medias, of course, have agendas and allegiances. - You don't have neither the skill nor the resources to ver…

Tim Ferris' idea about filter of consequences is interesting. Except for the fact that that information has likely passed through filters of propaganda and almost certainly passed through filters of ignorance, stupidity, and bias. No matter how well-informed, intelligent, and unbiased you think the deliverer of said information might be unless he's telling you something he witnessed first hand.

Re: Stop Reading News (2013)

#62
post #43

Sigh. Why is it that people seem to think that the only alternative to one bad thing on a continuum is a bad thing at the opposite end of the continuum. There's a lot of room between "obsessively read everything" and "you didn't know about the tornado warning until your house blew over". I get that it's hard to find the best spot on the continuum. And that best spot is probably not the same for everyone. It's interes…

>It's interesting that this article was written 10 years ago. Oh, you will definitely enjoy this quote! Try to guess when it was written. (Warning: there is a spoiler in the replies.) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38610428

I suppose I was primed to believe it was an old quote, so I assumed somewhere in the mid or late 1800s. But Thomas Jefferson! Heh.

I guess this shouldn't be surprising: news publishers have to pay their staff and keep the lights on, and always to some extent will be biased toward journalism that sells.

But also consider that Jefferson is on the side of the state: even if he was in favor of freedom of the press, I'm sure he had his own biases that made him think journalists could be annoying, at best.

Re: Stop Reading News (2013)

#63
post #9

Earlier quoted context omitted.

News become part of history but I don't think history is the integral of old news. To think about things maybe dear to us, the history of Apple, Steve Jobs, Amiga, Atari, is very different than the integral of news about those. It is more influenced by people's stories that were never "news". I'm not sure any news about these really constitute a major part of what we'd call the history there. https://en.wikipedia.org…

> A lot of news is just PR. It seems like the distinction between PR and news as content is clear though, and their conflation is from being published together > News become part of history but I don't think history is the integral of old news. Certainly not; so my mental model can be amended: History ~= integration(old news + X) dt And my question then is what to use as X?

My point was that what you think is news, is actually PR. You might have the image of journalists hard at work in the field gathering news, but most the news you get is actually not that, it's straight out PR. It is not someone observing something, it is some official body sending out PR to journalists. That can be the police, it can be a government, it can be companies, etc. It is published as "news" but is not what you think it is.

I think your point is that some PR is officially PR but that's not what I'm talking about.

Post reply on HN