Live data from Hacker News

State of Mozilla

stateof.mozilla.org

61–70 of 138 posts

Re: State of Mozilla

#62

As usual, you see a lot of hate against Mozilla's management team on HN. It makes me wonder, the people who hold these views, do they begrudingly use firefox? Do they use a different browser?

I am on record saying that I think Mozilla's management does not care about Firefox and are milking it to position Mozilla as some kind of big "Internet freedom" player.

I also use Firefox, and I plan to keep using it while waiting for the current managers to get replaced by someone who actually understands that you need a strong browser to even have a place at the table.

Re: State of Mozilla

#63
post #20

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You heard wrong? https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo

I mean the approval process for packages in Cargo is controlled by vendor.

By that reasoning almost every Linux distro is also non-free as it uses a default repository for packages.

Re: State of Mozilla

#64
post #20

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You heard wrong? https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo

I mean the approval process for packages in Cargo is controlled by vendor.

One can use cargo without using crates.io, though due to network effects it'd be a pain to do

Re: State of Mozilla

#65

As usual, you see a lot of hate against Mozilla's management team on HN. It makes me wonder, the people who hold these views, do they begrudingly use firefox? Do they use a different browser?

I will seriously consider Firefox again when the deplorable Chrome maintainers will kill ad blocking.

Re: State of Mozilla

#66
post #5

Ironic that this website feels pretty janky on Firefox for Android. The Read link under "Internet by the people for the people" leads to a page that has lots of rendering artifacts as your scroll through it, like colors blinking in, and also it fills your browsing history with every swipe. Below the financial statement and form 990 links there's just tons of blank space separated into different color segments. I have…

I'm running Firefox + uBlock on Android. Works fine. The blocked domains are all Google (unsurprisingly).

Re: State of Mozilla

#67
post #50
post #35

Earlier quoted context omitted.

https://blog.mozilla.org/en/mozilla/we-need-more-than-deplat...

They're anti insurrection? What a novel political idea

They should stay out of politics completely. This incident is a matter for law enforcement to deal with, not Mozilla. Mozilla is a tech firm, it's purpose is to develop a Web browser, period. It should not be involved in social policies.

I personally abhor Donald Trump, by the way. But I still think deplatforming and censorship are wrong.

Re: State of Mozilla

#68

(Writing from FF) $7bn. 2.66% market share. "Expanding our Board to create the internet we want" Sure, as long as the music is playing. [Edit] Looks like the music will stop earlier than suspected, https://www.brycewray.com/posts/2023/11/firefox-brink/

Where did you source the $7bn value from?

I have trouble reconciling this with the information present on the financial statement.

They have net assets of $1.2bn, and revenue for the year was $593mn minus $425mn for expenses.

Re: State of Mozilla

#69
post #23

Mozilla considered harmful. A bizarre money redistribution (and storage?) operation. The only thing people at large really want from it, Firefox, is an underfunded afterthought. https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4387539/firefox-money-invest...

I really wish Mozilla would stay out of politics, especially identity politics. And I've seen some pro-censorship advocacy from them in the name of Internet "safety."

>I really wish Mozilla would stay out of politics

Mozilla's entire purpose is political.

Re: State of Mozilla

#70

As usual, you see a lot of hate against Mozilla's management team on HN. It makes me wonder, the people who hold these views, do they begrudingly use firefox? Do they use a different browser?

> the people who hold these views, do they begrudingly use firefox

I do, despite the useless manager parasites who are intent to bleed Firefox dry to fatten themselves up.

If I didn't use Firefox then I'd have no motivation to care that Firefox is grossly mismanaged. It would be not my problem.

Post reply on HN