Earlier quoted context omitted.
The latency on that has to be massive.
Why? UAVs are piloted remotely, video games are played remotely with sub-100ms latency. Getting a remote driver connected might a while, but afterwards it seems like a mostly solved (in practice) problem.
GM's Cruise alleged to rely on human operators to achieve "autonomous" driving
61–70 of 190 posts
Re: GM's Cruise alleged to rely on human operators to achieve "autonomous" driving
#62Earlier quoted context omitted.
No.
Then you wouldn't know if I was completely incorrect or not.
Here’s a Waymo engineer explaining how they can’t joystick a car: https://www.reddit.com/r/SelfDrivingCars/s/2ujFLZoLbo
And here is Zoox’s video about their teleoperations: https://youtu.be/NKQHuutVx78?si=4PDnG0gQm6lEnp9v
No reason to believe Cruise is doing any different. If you have evidence of the contrary, please share it.
Re: GM's Cruise alleged to rely on human operators to achieve "autonomous" driving
#63> Two months ago, Kyle Vogt, the chief executive of Cruise, choked up as he recounted how a driver had killed a 4-year-old girl in a stroller at a San Francisco intersection. “It barely made the news,” he said, pausing to collect himself. “Sorry. I get emotional.” ... > Cruise’s board has hired the law firm Quinn Emanuel to investigate the company’s response to the incident, including its interactions with regulators…
Hmm? I saw it exactly the opposite. A lot of people in the autonomous driving industry are driven by exactly what Vogt describes (little girl in the stroller etc.). See also Chris Urmson of Waymo fame's TED talk, he talks about a similar motivation[1]. Its a fallacy everyone conveniently ignores. The woman the Cruise car ran over was actually first hit by a human driver who is still at-large , not a peep about him. T…
Many people have to be killed AT ONCE for it to be news worthy these days.
Re: GM's Cruise alleged to rely on human operators to achieve "autonomous" driving
#64Earlier quoted context omitted.
Then you wouldn't know if I was completely incorrect or not.
I do because I know self driving companies have talked about how remote operations work. It doesn’t involve taking control of the vehicle. Here’s a Waymo engineer explaining how they can’t joystick a car: https://www.reddit.com/r/SelfDrivingCars/s/2ujFLZoLbo And here is Zoox’s video about their teleoperations: https://youtu.be/NKQHuutVx78?si=4PDnG0gQm6lEnp9v No reason to believe Cruise is doing any different. If you…
Re: GM's Cruise alleged to rely on human operators to achieve "autonomous" driving
#65Earlier quoted context omitted.
I do because I know self driving companies have talked about how remote operations work. It doesn’t involve taking control of the vehicle. Here’s a Waymo engineer explaining how they can’t joystick a car: https://www.reddit.com/r/SelfDrivingCars/s/2ujFLZoLbo And here is Zoox’s video about their teleoperations: https://youtu.be/NKQHuutVx78?si=4PDnG0gQm6lEnp9v No reason to believe Cruise is doing any different. If you…
So you are 100% certain that remote operators can not take over the car?
Re: GM's Cruise alleged to rely on human operators to achieve "autonomous" driving
#66Cruise CEO here. Some relevant context follows. Cruise AVs are being remotely assisted (RA) 2-4% of the time on average, in complex urban environments. This is low enough already that there isn’t a huge cost benefit to optimizing much further, especially given how useful it is to have humans review things in certain situations. The stat quoted by nyt is how frequently the AVs initiate an RA session. Of those, many ar…
Re: GM's Cruise alleged to rely on human operators to achieve "autonomous" driving
#67Cruise CEO here. Some relevant context follows. Cruise AVs are being remotely assisted (RA) 2-4% of the time on average, in complex urban environments. This is low enough already that there isn’t a huge cost benefit to optimizing much further, especially given how useful it is to have humans review things in certain situations. The stat quoted by nyt is how frequently the AVs initiate an RA session. Of those, many ar…
Re: GM's Cruise alleged to rely on human operators to achieve "autonomous" driving
#68Cruise CEO here. Some relevant context follows. Cruise AVs are being remotely assisted (RA) 2-4% of the time on average, in complex urban environments. This is low enough already that there isn’t a huge cost benefit to optimizing much further, especially given how useful it is to have humans review things in certain situations. The stat quoted by nyt is how frequently the AVs initiate an RA session. Of those, many ar…
Hoo boy, sure wish the NYT had clarified that. That changes things significantly.
Re: GM's Cruise alleged to rely on human operators to achieve "autonomous" driving
#69Cruise CEO here. Some relevant context follows. Cruise AVs are being remotely assisted (RA) 2-4% of the time on average, in complex urban environments. This is low enough already that there isn’t a huge cost benefit to optimizing much further, especially given how useful it is to have humans review things in certain situations. The stat quoted by nyt is how frequently the AVs initiate an RA session. Of those, many ar…
Re: GM's Cruise alleged to rely on human operators to achieve "autonomous" driving
#70Cruise CEO here. Some relevant context follows. Cruise AVs are being remotely assisted (RA) 2-4% of the time on average, in complex urban environments. This is low enough already that there isn’t a huge cost benefit to optimizing much further, especially given how useful it is to have humans review things in certain situations. The stat quoted by nyt is how frequently the AVs initiate an RA session. Of those, many ar…
Funny, since I thought full autonomy was the goal of the company. 2 percent human intervention isn't scalable.