61–70 of 114 posts
Given that it's still Sam Altman, and his core value are "we market towards what will make us money", not all that different. The term "AI" has run its course, initially pulling in capital left and right, and that's drying up now that open source can do what the big boys came up with, too. So: rename the work to AGI, start a new hype train, and get the capital streams flowing anew.
The real question would be why anyone cares about empty mission statements like this anyway? Parsing them for meaning is nearly as useful as parsing your morning bowel movement to predict your day.
Cynical takes like yours are accurate in the descriptive sense. They are useful for describing and predicting outcomes. Ideals are typically prescriptive. They call us to improve upon what is. The two concepts are not incompatible, but for many they are seemingly contradictory.
People care because they have ideals. Perhaps they confuse the two concepts. Perhaps their expectations are too idealistic.
Given that it's still Sam Altman, and his core value are "we market towards what will make us money", not all that different. The term "AI" has run its course, initially pulling in capital left and right, and that's drying up now that open source can do what the big boys came up with, too. So: rename the work to AGI, start a new hype train, and get the capital streams flowing anew.
- AI investment is drying up
- FOSS AI is competitive with proprietary providers
From what I understand, AI grifting and investing has only just begun, and open source AI tools aren't on par with what Open AI is offering.
Given that it's still Sam Altman, and his core value are "we market towards what will make us money", not all that different. The term "AI" has run its course, initially pulling in capital left and right, and that's drying up now that open source can do what the big boys came up with, too. So: rename the work to AGI, start a new hype train, and get the capital streams flowing anew.
That's exactly what "make something people love" means. To love a product means to pay money for it.
Given that it's still Sam Altman, and his core value are "we market towards what will make us money", not all that different. The term "AI" has run its course, initially pulling in capital left and right, and that's drying up now that open source can do what the big boys came up with, too. So: rename the work to AGI, start a new hype train, and get the capital streams flowing anew.
Did I miss something? Since when is capital drying up in AI?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Checkout uBlock Origin https://ublockorigin.com/
How do you guys manage proper ad blocking on mobile? I haven’t gotten anything to work successfully (iOS).
As bad as I want to read past the first paragraph, it’s not even worth it to spend another second on this ad-ridden website.
https://chat.openai.com/share/251675a4-7b46-470e-a14e-fe6cf3...
As bad as I want to read past the first paragraph, it’s not even worth it to spend another second on this ad-ridden website.
You can just ask GPT-4 to summarise it instead. https://chat.openai.com/share/251675a4-7b46-470e-a14e-fe6cf3...
Ha! I like the subtle burn (and hint that OpenAI using AGI here is not carrying a whole lot of meaning other than hype)
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Checkout uBlock Origin https://ublockorigin.com/
How do you guys manage proper ad blocking on mobile? I haven’t gotten anything to work successfully (iOS).