Earlier quoted context omitted.
France launched a similar program and publish everything they can on Github See https://www.systeme-de-design.gouv.fr/ and https://github.com/GouvernementFR/dsfr
I find it really funny that it's published on GitHub with the MIT license, but with a disclaimer it's illegal to use it outside of government websites. It's great that it's publicly available, like many other public stuff the French Government is doing like https://beta.gouv.fr/ or the tax calculators, but it's still funny.
We’re opening up access to Gov.uk forms
61–70 of 195 posts
Re: We’re opening up access to Gov.uk forms
#62Earlier quoted context omitted.
Hoorah to that! We are lucky to have wonderful .gov services; highly available, accessible, frictionless, simple, informative, well written and bullshit-free. Maybe the best online central government services in the world - though I hear Estonia are a contender too. However I live in perpetual fear that at any moment some corrupt minister will do a deal with Microsoft and the Devil. Out will go plain HTML and common…
Umm, GOV.UK uses Google Analytics, Fastly CDN, AWS containers, and I believe is developing an app. (I worked at GDS until two years ago.)
Not to be too gushing or naive, I am quite aware that in the UK we recently "sold" big chunks of GCHQ to Amazon, so I'm not all wide eyed that parts of our government IT aren't idiots.
Re: We’re opening up access to Gov.uk forms
#63This looks great :-) However reading the How it works section, it states: "Each form needs an email address to be set for completed forms to be sent to when they’re submitted" So... erm is an email Inbox needed for integration? - how very 1990! In addition to email, for use by developers in other UK GOV departments - surely HTTP PUT of an XML or JSON document to a user nominated URL (with provided auth token) would h…
> surely HTTP PUT of an XML or JSON document to a user nominated URL
This is the bit that's more tricky than a static site. And then you need to do something with the data.
Re: We’re opening up access to Gov.uk forms
#64When I moved to the UK, one of the surprising things was how well the GOV.UK ecosystem worked. My original country uses a mishmash of Java applets, ajax-based websites, and a mixture of mildly broken, outdated web technologies, served from a variety of domains. GOV.UK was a breath of fresh air with its simple, consistent UI, served as static HTML. This is how internet services should look like.
Re: We’re opening up access to Gov.uk forms
#65Coming from Japan which is notorious for having the worst digital experience, the UK's gov.uk ecosystem is incredible
But it’s still inconsistent with all other government services.
Re: We’re opening up access to Gov.uk forms
#66Earlier quoted context omitted.
> No frills or silly scroll jacking animations plus javascript hogging contraptions that we see in almost all websites these days. Still the cookie warnings though :-( I've just visited on my phone the forms page linked in the title, and the first thing that greeted me was a full-screen page-blocking dialog with some cookie nonsense. You can't interact with the contents of the page until you decide how you feel about…
Legal requirement in the UK. No way around it.
Re: We’re opening up access to Gov.uk forms
#67When I moved to the UK, one of the surprising things was how well the GOV.UK ecosystem worked. My original country uses a mishmash of Java applets, ajax-based websites, and a mixture of mildly broken, outdated web technologies, served from a variety of domains. GOV.UK was a breath of fresh air with its simple, consistent UI, served as static HTML. This is how internet services should look like.
Re: We’re opening up access to Gov.uk forms
#68Earlier quoted context omitted.
> This is how internet services should look like. Yes, definitely. I've called UX designers out a couple times on the aesthetical complexity of their designs: if you award GOV.UK's quality a prize [0], why don't you mimic them instead of Google? [0] https://www.gov.uk/government/news/govuk-wins-design-of-the-...
The GOVUK deliberately bare branding serves a purpose similar to the old Tesco Value branding: to make it look austere. If it looked luxurious people would be more likely to complain about taxpayer's money being wasted.
Part of that involves really simple layouts, very high contrast text, legible fonts, compatibility across many devices, simple language etc.
It's certainly an added benefit that it gives an appearance of austerity, but that's more a byproduct of simplicity.
Re: We’re opening up access to Gov.uk forms
#69This looks great :-) However reading the How it works section, it states: "Each form needs an email address to be set for completed forms to be sent to when they’re submitted" So... erm is an email Inbox needed for integration? - how very 1990! In addition to email, for use by developers in other UK GOV departments - surely HTTP PUT of an XML or JSON document to a user nominated URL (with provided auth token) would h…
Re: We’re opening up access to Gov.uk forms
#70Earlier quoted context omitted.
Why would they not track users? They need to know how many users there are accessing from abroad (considering this is the UK which has many legitimate "abroads" like crown dependencies outside of the classic British citizens living outside of Britain), using what browsers and OSes, display sizes to know what they need to support. It would also be useful to know how much time users spend on the various pages, to know…
Sure, but why use google analytics? There are better trackers for this kind of thing that don't need cookies and can be self-hosted.