Live data from Hacker News

Pubs replaced banks in Ireland for several months in 1970 (2016)

businessinsider.com

61–70 of 96 posts

Re: Pubs replaced banks in Ireland for several months in 1970 (2016)

#61

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Recently I found that in a few of the more touristic areas in Ireland (which I rarely visit, being from here, was showing friends some places), a lot of pubs will offer a foreign exchange service of dubious legitimacy with debatably fair rates. Same thing in the border counties up north - you can often spend or exchange Sterling and Euro currency, but the rates will suck. In the 1990’s where I grew up, one of the two…

This is common in tourist-y areas everywhere. I was in Lisbon recently, and saw a number of places advertising that they accepted Sterling… at a rate of 1:1 with the Euro. A mere 15% FX fee.

What struck me as interesting is that one could do FX easily in a pub out in Blarney near the castle, while there’s not a single FX place in Cork City itself. Same thing in Galway - can’t find a FX place anywhere in the city, but if you head out to one of the tourist destinations you can do so at the pub.

You can’t do foreign exchange at a bank or credit union anymore without an account.

Re: Pubs replaced banks in Ireland for several months in 1970 (2016)

#62
post #41

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> This problem is far worse with a concentrated system than a decentralized one. They can break in different ways. If you're in an out-group or unpopular, it's not clear whether you're better off with n local pubs making a decision to accept your money informally or n/2 national banks making a decision while subject to oversight. In any case, this is a false premise: it's not like you're choosing from 5 local pubs. T…

> If you're in an out-group or unpopular, it's not clear whether you're better off with n local pubs making a decision to accept your money informally or n/2 national banks making a decision while subject to oversight. What is clear, however, is that you're better off with both systems existing in parallel because then you can use either one, rather than having the informal one prohibited by law so that you're forced…

> What is clear, however, is that you're better off with both systems existing in parallel because then you can use either one, rather than having the informal one prohibited by law so that you're forced into the other one whether it works for you or not.

Yes, but we've never had that: pubs don't do banking under normal circumstances because they're outcompeted by the banks.

> If you want a permissionless money transfer system that anybody can use and nobody can be refused, why shouldn't that exist too?

I don't have a big objection to a parallel informal payment system. OTOH, these kinds of systems tend to have the problems that all the reddit alternatives have: they capture the least attractive and most problematic business because they only end up employed by an unusual subset of people.

I guess the closest analog we have of what you describe at scale is hawala.

Re: Pubs replaced banks in Ireland for several months in 1970 (2016)

#63

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is common in tourist-y areas everywhere. I was in Lisbon recently, and saw a number of places advertising that they accepted Sterling… at a rate of 1:1 with the Euro. A mere 15% FX fee.

What struck me as interesting is that one could do FX easily in a pub out in Blarney near the castle, while there’s not a single FX place in Cork City itself. Same thing in Galway - can’t find a FX place anywhere in the city, but if you head out to one of the tourist destinations you can do so at the pub. You can’t do foreign exchange at a bank or credit union anymore without an account.

Most post offices will do it, I think. I bought dollar notes in one a while back without any difficulty. But yeah, it’s not really a business banks would want to be in; if you’re doing it honestly it’s not very profitable, and it can be quite… money-launder-y. Best bet for non-eurozone tourists would be to use a neobank (Revolut etc)/pseudo-bank (Wise etc) that offers fair FX rates, and then use an ATM.

Re: Pubs replaced banks in Ireland for several months in 1970 (2016)

#64
post #36

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Or more importantly in Ireland, religions based discrimination

This is about the Republic of Ireland, where that wasn’t a huge factor (there was definitely some; comments in the newspapers from 1961 when Dublin got a Jewish mayor are eyebrow-raising, but it wouldn’t have been a huge issue for something like this). You’re thinking of Northern Ireland. That said, as I’ve mentioned elsewhere, Ireland in 1970 certainly did have other forms of discrimination which would’ve been much…

Interesting enough, one of Israel's presidents was an Irish Jew - Chaim Herzog [0]. If you listen to his speeches, you'd think you were listening to an announcer on RTE [1].

This has absolutely no bearing on the article and it's content.

[0] - https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chaim_Herzog

[1] - https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=3BWL66PUf7c

Re: Pubs replaced banks in Ireland for several months in 1970 (2016)

#65

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How were bankers not skinned alive? If someone owes you or I money and then suddenly they go on strike there will be a vicious reckoning.

Most people, presumably, aren’t as bloodthirsty as you; strikes, no matter how inconvenient, rarely result in mass murder of the strikers by the general public. Sometimes by the state, in totalitarian systems, but not by random people.

First of all bankers on strike isn't a normal strike. It's like parents going on strike and leaving their kids to die.

Think about it... I steal all of someones money and promise to pay them back later and they're just going to be nice about it? If this happened to a person... likely he will hunt me down and "extract" the money out of me through any means available.

Why? because typically survival depends on a persons' ability to spend money.

I am not bloodthirsty. Theft in any society typically results in extreme measures of punishment including forcefully kidnapping people and confining them in inhumane conditions (it's called prison). Additionally, when the "theft" involves survival, getting violent is a normal thing. This is not just a "totalitarian" measure.

What's going on here seems to be a social phenomenon because theft and a sketchy promise of repayment is essentially what happened. The only reason why the system remained stable was because people still accepted checks.

I mean would you accept an IOU as payment if you know the issuer essentially stole the money and won't return it when asked for it? Typically no.

Re: Pubs replaced banks in Ireland for several months in 1970 (2016)

#66

The article really wants to imply that because this worked, we shouldn't be afraid of "too big to fail", but it doesn't dare say that and kinda of ends up sitting between two chairs. "I'm not saying that banks crashing isn't bad, but it wasn't a problem for Ireland to have banks disappear" but the thing is, according to the article, trust in banks never disappeared, neither did the banks. People kept writing cheques…

How were bankers not skinned alive? If someone owes you or I money and then suddenly they go on strike there will be a vicious reckoning.

50 years after the civil war, Ireland would not particularly keen to start up the random violence again.

I suspect everyone assumed normality would resume "tomorrow", for a lot of tomorrows. Which is the other reason you can't just start up the lynchings, this isn't America and you'll have to live with these people and their families on a comparatively small island.

Re: Pubs replaced banks in Ireland for several months in 1970 (2016)

#67

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is common in tourist-y areas everywhere. I was in Lisbon recently, and saw a number of places advertising that they accepted Sterling… at a rate of 1:1 with the Euro. A mere 15% FX fee.

What struck me as interesting is that one could do FX easily in a pub out in Blarney near the castle, while there’s not a single FX place in Cork City itself. Same thing in Galway - can’t find a FX place anywhere in the city, but if you head out to one of the tourist destinations you can do so at the pub. You can’t do foreign exchange at a bank or credit union anymore without an account.

> You can’t do foreign exchange at a bank

(Somewhat rant, not really at you, just...What?) It's difficult to believe I'm even reading that. An institution that only deals with currency, and literally has almost no downside to accepting any customer for currency exchange ... won't accept currency exchange?

Most banks have far more resources that an FX stall to verify whether you're handing over junk.

There was a story last month about how banks are the only people left who can even determine whether "fake" Euro coins are fake because they're too high quality "fakes". Counterfeiters are cranking out magnetic, weight matching, material matching, currency that's nearly mint quality. And banks won't even do ForEx? People over in Eastern Europe have just given up. Don't even bother using banks, cause the banks will just tell you all the money's fake.

(TLDR; Feel free to ignore, this entire situation seems idiotic. Like humans just keep rushing towards dumb results.)

Re: Pubs replaced banks in Ireland for several months in 1970 (2016)

#68
post #67

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What struck me as interesting is that one could do FX easily in a pub out in Blarney near the castle, while there’s not a single FX place in Cork City itself. Same thing in Galway - can’t find a FX place anywhere in the city, but if you head out to one of the tourist destinations you can do so at the pub. You can’t do foreign exchange at a bank or credit union anymore without an account.

> You can’t do foreign exchange at a bank (Somewhat rant, not really at you, just...What?) It's difficult to believe I'm even reading that. An institution that only deals with currency, and literally has almost no downside to accepting any customer for currency exchange ... won't accept currency exchange? Most banks have far more resources that an FX stall to verify whether you're handing over junk. There was a story…

> and literally has almost no downside to accepting any customer for currency exchange

So, there are a few things going on. First of all, there are downsides; in particular, it’s a money laundering risk. But also, it’s logistically expensive; the bank has to keep a stock of foreign money, and occupy an actual human dealing with it, and, these days, the rates they can reasonably charge for it are pretty low.

If you’re looking for someone to blame for this, probably primarily blame the free market. Traditionally, banks did physical FX, at rates that were generally a horrendous ripoff, but all consumer FX was a horrendous ripoff so what were you going to do. Today, it’s possible for consumers to do FX with costs in the 0.5% range, lower for large amounts or if they pay upfront for Revolut’s premium plan or something. This doesn’t leave much margin for the banks if they want to be even vaguely competitive, so they’re only going to do it if it’s cheap to do. It is not cheap to do.

This is actually generally a positive outcome for most consumers; FX is much cheaper and more convenient than it used to be for more people; it’s only if you want to exchange physical money that it has become more difficult.

Re: Pubs replaced banks in Ireland for several months in 1970 (2016)

#69
post #62

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> If you're in an out-group or unpopular, it's not clear whether you're better off with n local pubs making a decision to accept your money informally or n/2 national banks making a decision while subject to oversight. What is clear, however, is that you're better off with both systems existing in parallel because then you can use either one, rather than having the informal one prohibited by law so that you're forced…

> What is clear, however, is that you're better off with both systems existing in parallel because then you can use either one, rather than having the informal one prohibited by law so that you're forced into the other one whether it works for you or not. Yes, but we've never had that: pubs don't do banking under normal circumstances because they're outcompeted by the banks. > If you want a permissionless money trans…

> Yes, but we've never had that: pubs don't do banking under normal circumstances because they're outcompeted by the banks.

Really what happens is that the banks don't wish to be outcompeted so if something starts taking their business under normal circumstances then it gives them the incentive to fix the problem. But that's exactly why the alternate systems should be permitted -- it gives them the kick in the ass needed to make the banking system fix its shortcomings.

> OTOH, these kinds of systems tend to have the problems that all the reddit alternatives have: they capture the least attractive and most problematic business because they only end up employed by an unusual subset of people.

That's what they're for. They serve the needs of the people who the traditional banking system doesn't serve.

And it's not obvious that this is even the case, if they would be allowed to operate openly instead of being something you only use because you cannot use anything else.

For example, there are different kinds of businesses. In some cases the business itself is questionable, e.g. because it's very small and has no reputation history, and then you want a payment system (like credit cards) that offers buyer protection and chargebacks so the customer can feel confident that if the seller doesn't send the goods they can get their money back.

In other cases the business is perfectly trustworthy but it's the kind of business where the customers like to commit fraud, e.g. because the goods can easily be resold after being purchased with a stolen credit card. For this you want an irreversible payment system so the honest merchant can't get ripped off by these scammers.

Sometimes you want a payment system where the buyer can be anonymous, e.g. so that nobody is tracking what kind of literature you purchase.

You don't want a one-size-fits-all system, you want the diversity. Which you can't have if the law mandates one specific kind of system.

Re: Pubs replaced banks in Ireland for several months in 1970 (2016)

#70

> "I deal only with my regulars … I refuse strangers." > ‘They are mostly strangers to us, and we just have to play it by ear in deciding whether to accept a cheque’, said an official.” Sounds like a recipe for discrimination and inequality, which isn't mentioned in either article.

Right, much better for everybody to be screwed in the name of equity.

Could you please stop taking HN threads further into ideological battle? We had to warn you about this just the other day: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37699522.

It destroys what this site is for, so we end up having to ban accounts that keep doing it.

If you'd please review https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and stick to the rules when posting here, we'd appreciate it.

Post reply on HN