Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm thinking they are hoping to find exploits that the security researcher(s) are working on, and may not be known to others (use a 0-day to steal other 0-days). I'd presume that a decent security researcher's laptop would have much more valuable things on it, compared to Bob the Waiter's laptop. Educated guess. Grain of salt, etc...
I don't know - I think primary research on these things might be easier than sifting through all the "exhaust" on someone else's laptop to figure out what they've discovered.
North Korean campaign targeting security researchers
61–70 of 302 posts
Re: North Korean campaign targeting security researchers
#62Earlier quoted context omitted.
those things aren't mutually exclusive. North Korea is a malnourished country, evidenced by the pretty stark fact that South Koreans are now so much taller that South Korean women are approaching the height of North Korean men. It's just that if you pump a quarter of your entire GDP into nukes and hackers you can still be decent at it even if your people are starving.
[flagged]
Re: North Korean campaign targeting security researchers
#63Evidence for attribution to North Korea?
"SoUrCe?" This is clearly comment bait. If you've done any type of opsec before you know the legal hurdles. This is coming from someone (me) who personally saw North Korean IP blocks visit malware research articles via combing the server IP logs and verifying the block.
Re: North Korean campaign targeting security researchers
#64I wonder what the chances are that a security researcher would execute a Windows binary they receive over chat from a rando. This isn't even security 101, just common sense at this point. If anything, I'm sure it gave researchers a chance to play around with the binary in a secure environment. They wouldn't even need to reverse engineer it, since the source code was made public by the attackers. Good guy black hats!…
> the threat actors sent a malicious file that contained at least one 0-day in a popular software package i.e. not executables
Re: North Korean campaign targeting security researchers
#65Earlier quoted context omitted.
those things aren't mutually exclusive. North Korea is a malnourished country, evidenced by the pretty stark fact that South Koreans are now so much taller that South Korean women are approaching the height of North Korean men. It's just that if you pump a quarter of your entire GDP into nukes and hackers you can still be decent at it even if your people are starving.
[flagged]
I mean the war is effectively over. It's been a cold war since the "cease fire" has been adhered to. It's not like they're going to stop trying if we agreed to take down the DMZ. Their entire culture is based around reunification and defeating the evil Americans.
Re: North Korean campaign targeting security researchers
#66Earlier quoted context omitted.
"SoUrCe?" This is clearly comment bait. If you've done any type of opsec before you know the legal hurdles. This is coming from someone (me) who personally saw North Korean IP blocks visit malware research articles via combing the server IP logs and verifying the block.
Attributing cybercrime is never a slam dunk unless you have physical evidence: devices, people, etc. /var/log/*/access.conf is not that. Virtually everything on the wire can be spoofed. Someone in Kansas could own an elaborate network that includes DPRK IPs. And that would be a desirable red herring for any independent criminal. WikiLeaks taught us that the CIA has tools for spoofing their payloads as Russian, Chines…
Re: North Korean campaign targeting security researchers
#67Earlier quoted context omitted.
those things aren't mutually exclusive. North Korea is a malnourished country, evidenced by the pretty stark fact that South Koreans are now so much taller that South Korean women are approaching the height of North Korean men. It's just that if you pump a quarter of your entire GDP into nukes and hackers you can still be decent at it even if your people are starving.
[flagged]
Could you elaborate on if you genuinely think this would resolve the issues the DPRK experiences?
Re: North Korean campaign targeting security researchers
#68I wonder what the chances are that a security researcher would execute a Windows binary they receive over chat from a rando. This isn't even security 101, just common sense at this point. If anything, I'm sure it gave researchers a chance to play around with the binary in a secure environment. They wouldn't even need to reverse engineer it, since the source code was made public by the attackers. Good guy black hats!…
If they have enough confidence to attribute and not disclose how/why, one can fairly guess they don't want to burn sources or indicators which might still be useful moving forward but likely won't be if disclosed...
Re: North Korean campaign targeting security researchers
#69Lifetimes ago as an intelligence officer I spent years tracking DPRK activities and developments. People shouldn’t underestimate their technical capacities or ability to recruit smart hard working people.
[flagged]
Plus they have pulled off a number of hacks that became mainstream news so I would expect plenty of people to think that North Korea has competent software developers.
Re: North Korean campaign targeting security researchers
#70Earlier quoted context omitted.
those things aren't mutually exclusive. North Korea is a malnourished country, evidenced by the pretty stark fact that South Koreans are now so much taller that South Korean women are approaching the height of North Korean men. It's just that if you pump a quarter of your entire GDP into nukes and hackers you can still be decent at it even if your people are starving.
[flagged]