Live data from Hacker News

SpaceX working with Cloudflare to speed up Starlink service

reuters.com

61–67 of 67 posts

Re: SpaceX working with Cloudflare to speed up Starlink service

#61

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm not sure how many times you want me to repeat the same comment, but anecdotes don't match reality. Ookla and the FAA consistently show Starlink speeds on the decline to about 1/3 of what you're seeing for most users. The fact that you're in a (temporarily) uncongested area doesn't mean your speeds will stay what they are.

It's a little weird to me that you're telling me the thing I just experienced "doesn't match reality". You can say it doesn't match the typical experience or something, but surely what I just experienced is reality. What me being in a relatively uncongested area means is that I'm exactly the kind of customer Starlink was meant for...

https://www.starlink.com/map?view=download

Re: SpaceX working with Cloudflare to speed up Starlink service

#62

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm not sure how many times you want me to repeat the same comment, but anecdotes don't match reality. Ookla and the FAA consistently show Starlink speeds on the decline to about 1/3 of what you're seeing for most users. The fact that you're in a (temporarily) uncongested area doesn't mean your speeds will stay what they are.

FCC cited Ookla. These aren't independent sources

https://www.starlink.com/map?view=download

Re: SpaceX working with Cloudflare to speed up Starlink service

#63

Earlier quoted context omitted.

FCC cited Ookla. These aren't independent sources

https://www.starlink.com/map?view=download

Merci. Still not relevant for the subsidies though since it's forward looking

Re: SpaceX working with Cloudflare to speed up Starlink service

#64

Earlier quoted context omitted.

So much nonsense. Starlink is nothing new lol. And sure launch is the only thing differnet about it, mmh sure. You shit on Starlink and then hype up OneWeb a system that is generations behind technologically, went bust and has far, far, far less capability. While also being worst for space pollution. Also SpaceX just made a profit, despite investment in future Starlink and Starship. Starlink is already cashflow posit…

Then tell me, what is new about starlink? You just refuted it without naming one thing. They did not make a profit. That was a speculative article and nobody knows how they're accounting for starlink costs.

First of all, quantity is a quality all on its own. This has to be repeated often, having one of something is far easier then having 1000s. So even if, nothing in Starlink was knew, nothing that is one Starlink was ever produced the way it is for Starlink. Starlinks vertical integration and mass production is totally knew in the sat industry.

Now since you might not want to count that (despite mass production of sats being a huge challange), lets look at some other things. While Electric propulsion isn't knew, it wasn't exactly common specially for non science missions. Starlink v1 used Krypton, as far as I know Krypton wasn't used on operational sats. The Starlink v2 Argon thruster is pretty damn revolutionary in its performance and the first use of argon on operational. So if you want to name 'one' thing this would be it and it isn't really debatable.

Starlinks laser communication is top of the line in terms of performance and having a whole constellation of laser link sats coordinating for best connection is certainty unique. And not as a research project, but actually operational on commercial sats.

Starlink flat construction is also pretty unique, making so many sats stack-able is a significant advance if you compare it how the other largest constellations were deployed. There is additional innovation in the way they are deployed threw a rocket rotation and a spring mechanism, its unique and brilliant.

The Starlink sats also use a sun shield to make the sats harder to see for earth observation, as far as I know this has not been done before.

Starlink operations is also whole unique, on a personal per sat bases SpaceX is leading by far. SpaceX has a very small team for operations and made excellent use of automatic avoidance on a large scale, doing avoidance even for even unlikely collisions.

We simple don't have all the information, we don't know everything there is to know about the antennas for example. They are likely quite a unique design as the ground terminals are, but we just don't know.

I could go on to talk about ground systems as well, be lets leave it here.

The simple reality is, Starlink as system is fundamentally revolutionary. Any claim that cheaper rockets is the only 'new thing' is basically putting a board before your head and screaming 'lalalalal'. Even being charitable and assume that all individual technologies were demonstrated as research before doesn't change how revolutionary the system as a whole is.

Re: SpaceX working with Cloudflare to speed up Starlink service

#65

Earlier quoted context omitted.

FCC cited Ookla. These aren't independent sources

https://www.starlink.com/map?view=download

Moreso these aren't relevant to denial of the application because it wasn't publicly available then.

And these are peak hours rather than median living day hours that providers usually use

Re: SpaceX working with Cloudflare to speed up Starlink service

#66
post #7
post #3

[flagged]

except for the issue where Elon just on a whim decided to geofence the spaceX usage in Ukraine/Russia conflict to not allow it to work when near the border or in Russia :/ per article: https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2023/08/28/elon-musks-sha...

Same whims brought starlink to Ukraine in the first place

Re: SpaceX working with Cloudflare to speed up Starlink service

#67

>Starlink is one of a growing number of makers of small satellites that are focused on providing satellite-based internet, including Amazon.com's (AMZN.O) Kuiper, Britain's OneWeb and venture capital-backed Planet. Planet is in the earth observation business, not satellite internet

And Amazon hasn’t launched any satellites yet and appears to be still years away from a production constellation.
Post reply on HN