Live data from Hacker News

Meta to release open-source commercial AI model

zdnet.com

61–70 of 168 posts

Re: Meta to release open-source commercial AI model

#63
Zuck is a total killer. What better way to fight Google and Microsoft than to effectively spawn thousands of potential competitors to their AI businesses with this (and other) releases. There will be a mad scramble over the released weights to develop new tech, these startups will raise tons of money, and then fight the larger incumbents.

This is not charity, this is a shrewd business move.

Re: Meta to release open-source commercial AI model

#64
post #41

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Quite the opposite, this is great for Meta's competitors. Meta is not trying to get market share with this strategy, it's trying to commoditize their complements ( https://www.joelonsoftware.com/2002/06/12/strategy-letter-v/ ) Content is a complement to a social network: the cheaper it is to create content, the more content is available, the easier it is to optimize a feed, the larger the time people spend in the pla…

kind of a dystopian nightmare world in which large corporations utilize AI to create low cost, infinite content that humans engage with (mostly content catering to the human tendency for tribalism, prestige, sexual desires etc...), sounds like we are creating a world similar to the Matrix.

I think we may have already entered it. Infinite scroll based feeds like TikTok, Instagram, and Threads (and possible Reddit these days) … just AI algorithm deciding what you should find “entertaining” or “important”.

It’s really the ultimate nightmare with the internet becoming just TV 3.0 in which content is controlled and curated … you just consume mindlessly.

Any attempts to create a Reddit clone.. or system in which people freely communicate is now “regulated” for “hate” speech or “terrorism”. The days of open discourse … appear to be numbered. Even email will be analyzed by AI to look for “trends” or “optimize” employee efficiency.

It really is time for a new internet.

Re: Meta to release open-source commercial AI model

#65
I remember arguing with people who honest to god thought that LLAMA was some sort of secret ploy, to trick startups into using it, so that meta could sue them for using it commercially.

Well now there is a commerical release. I guess it wasn't some corporate plot after all!

Some people just can't admit when a corporation does a good thing.

(In this case, the good thing is being done to obsolete their competitors, but it is good none the less, that a commerical LLM is available for people to use for free)

Re: Meta to release open-source commercial AI model

#67
post #47

From the recent story about the Sarah Silverman lawsuit: The complaint lays out in steps why the plaintiffs believe the datasets have illicit origins — in a Meta paper detailing LLaMA, the company points to sources for its training datasets, one of which is called ThePile, which was assembled by a company called EleutherAI. ThePile, the complaint points out, was described in an EleutherAI paper as being put together…

Sometimes, I wonder what if someone in XYZ country downloads whole of Z-Library/Libgen, all the books ever printed, and all the papers ever published, all the newspapers and so on. and releases the model open source. There are jurisdictions with Lax rules.

And they will have much better knowledge, answers, etc than the western, Lawyer approved models.

Sometimes knowledge needs to be set free I guess.

Re: Meta to release open-source commercial AI model

#68

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Really, really bad look for Eleuther if this is true. I did not expect them do something like this and not even see the issue with it.

Move fast and break the law.

Copyright laws should be amended to allow this scenario. If I read a book and write about it in a blog, it is considered review. Why shouldn’t we allow companies to do the same to train their models? Overall it will benefit society more than it hurts some rich authors.

Re: Meta to release open-source commercial AI model

#69
post #59

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Move fast and break the law.

It's far from certain at this stage whether this does break the law.

While this may be true, the reverse is also true, and even if it’s legal, there are other ways to frame this that are worth considering, e.g. It could technically be legal, but not in accordance with the spirit of the law. Updates to laws are required. The fact that the model is legal is an additional problem on top of the gap in the law.

I think my main point here is that “legal” does not imply moral or acceptable to society, and our understanding of the technical legal status is not a prerequisite for exploring those factors, which may be the thing that changes the legal status in response to the major shift in landscape.

Re: Meta to release open-source commercial AI model

#70
post #47

From the recent story about the Sarah Silverman lawsuit: The complaint lays out in steps why the plaintiffs believe the datasets have illicit origins — in a Meta paper detailing LLaMA, the company points to sources for its training datasets, one of which is called ThePile, which was assembled by a company called EleutherAI. ThePile, the complaint points out, was described in an EleutherAI paper as being put together…

> It's not like Meta can remove these books from the training set without retraining from scratch (or at least the last checkpoint before they were used).

They probably can:

https://github.com/zjunlp/EasyEdit

> I wonder if this is going to cause issues down the road.

There are some popular Stable Diffusion models, being run in small businesses, that I am certain have CSAM in them because they have a particular 4chan model in their merging lineage.

... And yet, it hasn't blown up yet? I have no explanation, but running "illegal" weights seems more sustainable than I would expect.

Post reply on HN