Earlier quoted context omitted.
Do you think that you can easily reach the same userbase with a 3rd party installation process as the official app store one?
Yes. How do you think we did it in the bad ole days? Don't fall for the propensity of Big Tech to scare you away from general purpose computing. If you're capable of writing, testing, and publishing an app in the first place, you have an obligation to educate the public about just what the nature of the sacrifices are that are being made by accepting a "walled garden" status quo for computing. If you're only in it fo…
Google un-bans Downloader app, but developer still mad about “broken” DMCA
61–70 of 105 posts
Re: Google un-bans Downloader app, but developer still mad about “broken” DMCA
#62Re: Google un-bans Downloader app, but developer still mad about “broken” DMCA
#63I had an app that was making about $10,000 USD a month. It was taken down by Google because apparently I copied some other developer's iOS app. I asked them to tell me the name of the iOS app they believed I copied. They named the iOS version of my Android app. They basically accused me of copying myself because the Android version was under my company's name while the iOS version was under my name. Google unbanned t…
Re: Google un-bans Downloader app, but developer still mad about “broken” DMCA
#64Re: Google un-bans Downloader app, but developer still mad about “broken” DMCA
#65I had an app that was making about $10,000 USD a month. It was taken down by Google because apparently I copied some other developer's iOS app. I asked them to tell me the name of the iOS app they believed I copied. They named the iOS version of my Android app. They basically accused me of copying myself because the Android version was under my company's name while the iOS version was under my name. Google unbanned t…
Re: Google un-bans Downloader app, but developer still mad about “broken” DMCA
#66I had an app that was making about $10,000 USD a month. It was taken down by Google because apparently I copied some other developer's iOS app. I asked them to tell me the name of the iOS app they believed I copied. They named the iOS version of my Android app. They basically accused me of copying myself because the Android version was under my company's name while the iOS version was under my name. Google unbanned t…
This is exactly the reason I would have never considered to build any apps. I have had couple of ideas but the risk is to big that a faceless corporation is going cancel your business without any reason and visibility.
Re: Google un-bans Downloader app, but developer still mad about “broken” DMCA
#67Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is exactly the reason I would have never considered to build any apps. I have had couple of ideas but the risk is to big that a faceless corporation is going cancel your business without any reason and visibility.
Google can also take your website out of their search results, or derank you a lot. That would effectively be a death penalty for many online businesses.
But the difference with websites is that there's always an alternative. If The Google decides your site is wrongthink or their superior AI intelligence flags your site for infringing on your own copyright, there are countless other ways to make your site seen elsewhere.
Let's face it, nobody's going to sideload your mobile app without installing it through an app store unless your app is in the position to say F-U to The Google like Tik Tok, Twitter, Instagram, and so on. People will visit a website that's been posted on social media or linked on some blog, but they won't download an APK.
Re: Google un-bans Downloader app, but developer still mad about “broken” DMCA
#68Earlier quoted context omitted.
Do you think that you can easily reach the same userbase with a 3rd party installation process as the official app store one?
Yes. How do you think we did it in the bad ole days? Don't fall for the propensity of Big Tech to scare you away from general purpose computing. If you're capable of writing, testing, and publishing an app in the first place, you have an obligation to educate the public about just what the nature of the sacrifices are that are being made by accepting a "walled garden" status quo for computing. If you're only in it fo…
I think you would reach a fraction of the userbase with a 3rd party process due to several factors.