Live data from Hacker News

Databricks acquires serverless Postgres vendor bit.io

databricks.com

61–70 of 119 posts

Re: Databricks acquires serverless Postgres vendor bit.io

#61
Been playing with CockroachLabs (CockroachDB Cloud) as a cloud db platform, and relatively happy with my testing so far. It isn't completely pg compatible, and do wish they'd expose a web based query interface with better connection pooling characteristics.

That said, mostly PG compatible data types, indexes and queries, horizontally scalable with pay for what you use, free and reserved tiers.

Re: Databricks acquires serverless Postgres vendor bit.io

#62
post #53

Damn, 30 days is quick. I found out about https://neon.tech but then quickly ran into a major bug, and then thankfully found out about bit.io, which is what I use for https://dittoed.app . Looks like I will have to go back to neon (they fixed the bug). If anyone has other ideas, I'm all ears. Project is hosted on Cloudflare and they have D1 now, but Dittoed uses a little bit of PostGIS.

Have you tried supabase?

Re: Databricks acquires serverless Postgres vendor bit.io

#63

"Serverless"...this word is so thrown around nowadays that it lost its original meaning. Same way the phrase "we're like a family" transitioned from a beloved one in 50's to its thrown away in 90's meaningless all the way to today be considered a red flag when you hear such a word at a hiring interview, the "serverless" word is in its late 90's nowadays. One decade and will become just another red flag.

What was the original meaning? When I hear "serverless" I think basically: 1. I don't have to think about or manage any servers 2. Usage is metered at a very fine-grained level (per X requests to the API/per GB of data/etc) 3. No fixed cost. You only pay for usage. Was there a different meaning originally?

Distributed apps. No central server involved. Peer to peer is one. Or each app is a server too and the information propagates in ripple like style. You connect to me, we sync, then another connects to me and this way the info that only you had now he has it too (and me of course). That's the original serverless idea. Not this walled garden crap with "cloud". Cloud is just a computer that is not yours and anything you put in there it's no longer just yours (or in most cases when you lose the account is no longer yours, period! - HN has plenty of horror stories from Google, Amazon, Microsoft that shit on people and call it rain).

Re: Databricks acquires serverless Postgres vendor bit.io

#64
post #8

Corresponding statement from bit.io here: https://blog.bit.io/whats-next-for-bit-io-joining-databricks...

2 months ago they had a blog post titled "bit.io’s new pricing Always available. Guaranteed performance. No surprises."

Surprise!

Re: Databricks acquires serverless Postgres vendor bit.io

#65
post #43

I haven't heard of either of those companies. I don't even fully understand what Databricks does. But it's clear that they have no problem shutting down a production database offering with 30 days notice, and have the gall to title this action "Investing in the Developer Experience". If this doesn't send a message that you shouldn't trust them with anything important, I don't know what would.

> But it's clear that they have no problem shutting down a production database offering with 30 days notice

Maybe there is no production db left from paying customers?

Re: Databricks acquires serverless Postgres vendor bit.io

#66
post #54

This is interesting... possibly a move by Databricks to try and build on their "data lakehouse" concept to counter the recent "Fabric platform" announcements at MS Build. Databricks coined the "Delta lake" concept and are still (just about) leading the way, but Fabric has the potential from MS to take away that marketshare. Databricks need to improve their "serverless SQL" offering, and add a serious "data warehouse"…

I'm perusing the Fabric docs and they are using Delta Lake, Spark and Azure Databricks as part of that solution

Re: Databricks acquires serverless Postgres vendor bit.io

#67

What benefits does one get from using bit.io or other equivalents compared to the AWS built in Aurora? is their offering different and I'm just confused by the jargon?

It takes < 10 seconds to go from no account to database w/ bit.io

Feature or liability depending on the market segment. To a ton of enterprise customers this is a nightmare.

Re: Databricks acquires serverless Postgres vendor bit.io

#68

That's a bummer, I really liked using bit.io for little experiments. That being said i never paid for it so i can't really complain.

same, I'm a paying customer and liked it. I don't have 'production' level demands but was doing lots of prototyping and testing of ideas. Very easy to use and reliable enough to count on.

Stinky.

Re: Databricks acquires serverless Postgres vendor bit.io

#69
post #25

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't mean to take away from getting hired at databricks. But my understanding is they essentially got hired at Databricks? Maybe got a paycheck to do it? Meanwhile they shuttered and abandoned the product and all customers. Is it really the goal to make an mvp and plan to get noticed and acquired vs actually making a product, customers can migrate in a month or not we don't care? The product they made was literall…

Well, it is going to be incredible journey for customers now.

Context for new readers

https://ourincrediblejourney.tumblr.com/

Re: Databricks acquires serverless Postgres vendor bit.io

#70
post #19
post #18

Are there alternatives to the database service with similar API or is it leaving a gap in the market?

Neon is an awesome serverless Postgres: https://neon.tech/

Second Neon, they know what they're doing. It's not their first rodeo.
Post reply on HN