Earlier quoted context omitted.
I believe radix sort belongs first in this list.
The most elegant is certainly sleepsort. Maybe not the most efficient, but definitely elegant.
“Don Knuth Plays with ChatGPT” but with ChatGPT-4
61–70 of 141 posts
Re: “Don Knuth Plays with ChatGPT” but with ChatGPT-4
#62Earlier quoted context omitted.
Still fairly impressive. Probably better than most people could do if given 60 seconds, but probably worse than most people if given 10 minutes.
I would rate a person who provides no sentence at all as performing significantly better, and I suspect most people could pretty quickly come up with something.
Why?
> I suspect most people could pretty quickly come up with something
It only takes 60 seconds to test that on yourself. It's not that easy to come up with something of similar length to ChatGPT's answer that also sounds somewhat natural/sensible.
Re: “Don Knuth Plays with ChatGPT” but with ChatGPT-4
#63Re: “Don Knuth Plays with ChatGPT” but with ChatGPT-4
#64Re: “Don Knuth Plays with ChatGPT” but with ChatGPT-4
#65The sequence of these two threads is just too perfect. Almost likely someone is trying to make a point.
Re: “Don Knuth Plays with ChatGPT” but with ChatGPT-4
#66Re: “Don Knuth Plays with ChatGPT” but with ChatGPT-4
#67Earlier quoted context omitted.
It did get closer. For that type of query you can ask it check its work and can usually triangulate on correct answer within a single prompt, eventually.
I would be cautious of a Clever Hans effect there. If you repeat the question until you get the right answer you're providing the AI with significant extra information.
Re: “Don Knuth Plays with ChatGPT” but with ChatGPT-4
#68Earlier quoted context omitted.
> the only bad thing is that it's hallucinating an answer instead of admitting it doesn't know. Isn't this a fundamental issue?
Only if it can't be corrected. How do you rate the likelihood of this problem being unsolvable?
Fairly high.
Re: “Don Knuth Plays with ChatGPT” but with ChatGPT-4
#69Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's wrong. (An example of a sentence with only five letter words I wrote in less than 60 seconds)
I wasn't clear on how was using "better". Your example is better in that it fulfills the requirement, but I don't think it's as impressive as ChatGPT's answer. How long would it take to make a sentence that is at least 7 words (and also making sense, and ideally sounding good)?
Re: “Don Knuth Plays with ChatGPT” but with ChatGPT-4
#70Earlier quoted context omitted.
> the only bad thing is that it's hallucinating an answer instead of admitting it doesn't know. Isn't this a fundamental issue?
Only if it can't be corrected. How do you rate the likelihood of this problem being unsolvable?