Live data from Hacker News

Mercedes EVs can go faster for $60 a month

cnn.com

61–70 of 555 posts

Re: Mercedes EVs can go faster for $60 a month

#61
post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Aren't max speeds limited all the time on vehicles, with state mandated governors? I know some countries require them on all automobiles. Even the US requires them on ebikes.

It's not a legal requirement but most cars AFAIU are electronically limited to about 115 mph

What region are you speaking of? AFAIK, any car marketed in the US to do over 115mph (of which there are many), will do over 115mph.

Re: Mercedes EVs can go faster for $60 a month

#62
post #45
post #41

Earlier quoted context omitted.

but we mustn't agree to such practices, because if this goes legal next step will be prevent from software hacking and/or police/MOT checks for illegal software tampering

This is already the case in California. Tapering with the ECU (in a detectable way), will cause your car to flunk the smog exam, which, unrectified, makes it illegal to drive your car.

Is there a smog exam in California for electric cars? Honest question, as it wouldn't surprise me if there was due to complicated legislation.

Re: Mercedes EVs can go faster for $60 a month

#63
post #54
post #26

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Simple means no advanced safety, comfort and other features, once software is involved it will never be tested enough especially at the price point cars are sold at.

Exactly. I have zero interest in "advanced features" which is why I still drive vintage high end european cars I maintain myself, and not a Tesla. Nearly all cars since the mid 70s have had plenty of very simple software on board in each of the control modules- ABS, fuel injection, ignition, etc. and it works flawlessly in widespread global use for decades with no issues because it is so simple. These things are so s…

Have you read the NASA investigation of the Toyota’s unintended acceleration accidents? It’s millions of lines of not properly tested spaghetti code. But I admit that it mostly worked pretty well. Unfortunately modern cars are significantly safer than vintage ones so we are stuck with complex software for better and for worse

Re: Mercedes EVs can go faster for $60 a month

#65
post #45
post #41

Earlier quoted context omitted.

but we mustn't agree to such practices, because if this goes legal next step will be prevent from software hacking and/or police/MOT checks for illegal software tampering

This is already the case in California. Tapering with the ECU (in a detectable way), will cause your car to flunk the smog exam, which, unrectified, makes it illegal to drive your car.

Another thing that only affects poor people. In California your first smog check is at 6 years. Most wealthy people turn over their cars more often than that. So a rich person can hack it up and not worry because they'll ditch the car before its ever checked.

Re: Mercedes EVs can go faster for $60 a month

#66

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I paid for Windows once and continue to get updates. Same for my eInk tablet. Why should my car not be the same?

Leaving aside that your car shouldn't need updates for the basic function of going faster when you push the accelerator, do you want to have an unskippable advert played on the car's display before you can pull away?

It’s coming sooner or later isn’t it? For the right price I might consider that, yes

Re: Mercedes EVs can go faster for $60 a month

#67
post #62
post #45

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is already the case in California. Tapering with the ECU (in a detectable way), will cause your car to flunk the smog exam, which, unrectified, makes it illegal to drive your car.

Is there a smog exam in California for electric cars? Honest question, as it wouldn't surprise me if there was due to complicated legislation.

As of now, no. But I wouldn't be surprised because the smog exam doubles as a road safety check, and as more EVs are on the road that are getting old, they're gonna want a way to verify road safety. Probably a state battery exam or something.

Re: Mercedes EVs can go faster for $60 a month

#68
post #17
post #2

It won’t be my interest in saving the planet that stops me from buying cars, it’ll be bullshit like this. I want to own my car. I don’t want it to be connected (beyond acting as a hotspot) to the internet or to some central service. Have we not learned anything?

Don't you want software upgrades? cars are loaded with technology, some of it is for "fun" like navigation of music services, but a lot if for safety reasons and this requires frequent updating.

No. I don’t want software upgrades. I want a vehicle that moves me from A to B with the least environmental disruption as possible.

If this can’t happen then I’m cycling or taking the bus.

Re: Mercedes EVs can go faster for $60 a month

#69

I want to see this legislated out of existence. To be clear, because every time this comes up some dickfucks come in here and start making excuses about how it's better to rent in some cases and that this is just amortizing the whole payment, and there are some people who want this: No. This is a fucking terrible deal even just using mercedes numbers. It takes a whopping 30 months (2.5 years) for the monthly payment…

Say it louder for the people in the back. As a consumer, never accept this. Not now, not ever.

Re: Mercedes EVs can go faster for $60 a month

#70

I want to see this legislated out of existence. To be clear, because every time this comes up some dickfucks come in here and start making excuses about how it's better to rent in some cases and that this is just amortizing the whole payment, and there are some people who want this: No. This is a fucking terrible deal even just using mercedes numbers. It takes a whopping 30 months (2.5 years) for the monthly payment…

These complaints remind me of complaints I've heard about "day one" DLC (DownLoadable Content) in video games. For those unfamiliar, it's content which is available in the game upon its release but you have to pay extra for it. Sometimes, players are given the option to buy the Ultra Digital Deluxe Collector's Edition which comes with the DLC and "exclusive" shit (and also costs extra).

If it's not rent seeking, it's drip pricing, it's added-on sales tax, it's $0.99 instead of $1[0], it's the Ultra Digital Deluxe Collector's Edition. I would always advocate: don't give them your business.

I'm sure I'm preaching to the choir here. I know it's a lot easier said than done to avoid such ploys. Still, that is the strongest personal option. Avoid them like the plague and tell your friends and family why. If a business' current practices seem better than you remember, hold on to the memory; make them work to prove any marketed change of heart. (It may be hazardous to my health to hold my breath waiting for the $0.99 shit to stop.)

[0] There was a card shop (games shop, comic book store, that sort of thing) I went to as a kid. They priced stuff like $5 and it was actually $5 when I went to pay. 12-year-old me "didn't even know that was legal".

Post reply on HN