Earlier quoted context omitted.
1. It's strange that you've put quotes around something I didn't say. 2. I said a lot more than what you put quotes around, which explains the method of action. If you want more specific information, you'll have to engage enough with what I've already said to ask a more specific question. I won't waste my time explaining parts I've already explained and you've ignored.
You talk about the physical process, but not where the information came from. Information only comes from consciousness. If you think randomness created dna with a specific function I have a bridge to sell you
Ah, there it is, the total nonsense I was expecting.
That's not even a coherent scientific claim: it's not provable or disprovable because you can't even clearly define half the words. You're just saying things with no evidence because they were told to you.
Next time, save everyone some time and just make your argument for creationism up front without asking questions as if you were interested in answers. This whole pretending to ask questions thing you did here was dishonest.
Bye.