Live data from Hacker News

SpaceX closing in on first Starship Super Heavy launch

spacenews.com

61–70 of 189 posts

Re: SpaceX closing in on first Starship Super Heavy launch

#61

Press releases from SpaceX have alluded to a possible launch date of 420, which I think would be hilariously on brand.

How fucking lame, especially for a company that drug tests.

Lighten up. I don’t think that was voluntary https://sports.yahoo.com/elon-musk-said-whole-spacex-1217322...

I’m sure he won’t be smoking weed on podcasts any more.

Re: SpaceX closing in on first Starship Super Heavy launch

#62

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How fucking lame, especially for a company that drug tests.

Putting a rocket into orbit requires a good understanding of science and reality. There is no actual scientific proof that occasionally using marijuana is a bad thing that would make a potential employee a bad employee. Maybe politicians don't like that reality, but they are not the ones putting people into orbit.

On top of that, you should fire bad employees because they’re bad, not because they do drugs and may or may not be bad.

Re: SpaceX closing in on first Starship Super Heavy launch

#63
post #57

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I understand the distinction but I wonder if it’s only useful because of the weird nature of previous rocket engineering efforts. Notably, NASA contracting out different components due to the quirks of being a government entity. SpaceX is much different than that but aren’t they rather similar to, say, car companies? I mean if SpaceX is a rocket factory company, isn’t Ford a car factory company? We just don’t include…

Most definitely! I mean, Ford was revolutionary because it was the first car factory company, right? Before that, you had to have a weird german guy hand build your buggy.

Before Ford, there were thousands of bespoke car manufacturers all around the world, producing units in the hundreds per year.

Re: SpaceX closing in on first Starship Super Heavy launch

#64
post #28

Press releases from SpaceX have alluded to a possible launch date of 420, which I think would be hilariously on brand.

Can we please come up with some new "funny numbers" than 420, 69 and 42.

11:34 comes around twice a day. (Okay, once if you're in the military).

Re: SpaceX closing in on first Starship Super Heavy launch

#65
post #37

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Gwynne Shotwell has said that SpaceX is a rocket factory company, not a rocket company. I agree entirely, the possibilities here make me so excited.

I understand the distinction but I wonder if it’s only useful because of the weird nature of previous rocket engineering efforts. Notably, NASA contracting out different components due to the quirks of being a government entity. SpaceX is much different than that but aren’t they rather similar to, say, car companies? I mean if SpaceX is a rocket factory company, isn’t Ford a car factory company? We just don’t include…

yeah i think any company that's more than just a brand name / middle man could say that their production process is their product rather than what they actually sell.

spacex does not sell any rocket factories even if that is what they spend the most money on developing so i'd consider them a rocket company because to me a company should probably be described by what brings in the income

at some level, even a middle man could say that they are a sourcing and branding company rather whatever product bears their name

Re: SpaceX closing in on first Starship Super Heavy launch

#66
post #18

Whether or not they hit April specifically (some of which isn't under their control, freak weather or the like can happen) they've clearly been checking through prep at an impressive, disciplined pace and it'll be soon. And importantly once they start they've set things up to keep the iteration going and do more and more ironing things out, and then going into full production. All technical merits aside, that , mass…

Well articulated and completely agree. Starting to feel a bit like how things must have felt in the 60s...exciting.

Re: SpaceX closing in on first Starship Super Heavy launch

#68
post #28

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Can we please come up with some new "funny numbers" than 420, 69 and 42.

Why fix something that isn't broken? Some things like funny numbers and fart jokes should be ever-green.

I have 69 FartCoins. Hahaha. Too funny.

Re: SpaceX closing in on first Starship Super Heavy launch

#69
post #64
post #28

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Can we please come up with some new "funny numbers" than 420, 69 and 42.

11:34 comes around twice a day. (Okay, once if you're in the military).

Explanation for those not familiar:

1134 is the angel number, I think something to do with Tarot. I know there was the calculator trick: 1800-666=1134. Turn it upside down and it spells "hell".

The more you know.

Re: SpaceX closing in on first Starship Super Heavy launch

#70
If they can pull this off I think we may enter an age with a clear "Before super heavy reusable launch" and "after".

It's mind boggling how much stuff a Starship will be able to chuck into space and come down and then do it again and again.

Consider this, the military is starting to explore the idea of moving heavy military equipment anywhere in the world within 90 minutes using this kind of capability. International Space Station sized habitats are a handful of launches over months, not dozens over decades. A single Starship launch could place multiple hubble-sized space observatories up in a single launch.

Post reply on HN