Live data from Hacker News

OpenAI faces complaint to FTC that seeks suspension of ChatGPT releases

cnbc.com

61–70 of 82 posts

Re: OpenAI faces complaint to FTC that seeks suspension of ChatGPT releases

#61
post #60

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That article doesn't mention a service that was open to users (not to mention the point of the article is that AI had fewer false positives and false negatives than doctors, which would invalidate the premise of this argument). But if you want to apply the same logic to ChatGPT, then even if it's true that misdiagnoses are leading to skipped doctor's visits, it's still unlikely that anyone has died yet from that lack…

> That article doesn't mention a service that was open to users So? Most AI isn't. It's not all consumer products. > not to mention the point of the article is that AI had fewer false positives and false negatives than doctors, which would invalidate the premise of this argument I can say that about Tesla FSD. Press release overconfidence works both ways.

> So? Most AI isn't. It's not all consumer products.

You are moving the goal posts. Your argument was that non-Tesla AI has killed its users. There were no users of the service mentioned in the article, ergo none of them could have been killed by it.

> I can say that about Tesla FSD.

The difference is that Tesla FSD is actively used, and its false negatives and positives have actually killed people.

My argument was never that AI will not eventually kill people. It was that so far, Tesla AI has directly killed more people than any other AI.

Re: OpenAI faces complaint to FTC that seeks suspension of ChatGPT releases

#62
post #60

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> That article doesn't mention a service that was open to users So? Most AI isn't. It's not all consumer products. > not to mention the point of the article is that AI had fewer false positives and false negatives than doctors, which would invalidate the premise of this argument I can say that about Tesla FSD. Press release overconfidence works both ways.

> So? Most AI isn't. It's not all consumer products. You are moving the goal posts. Your argument was that non-Tesla AI has killed its users. There were no users of the service mentioned in the article, ergo none of them could have been killed by it. > I can say that about Tesla FSD. The difference is that Tesla FSD is actively used, and its false negatives and positives have actually killed people. My argument was n…

Nah, you're moving them.

> Yes. Elon Musk has killed more people with his AI than anyone else has with theirs.

That's "people" not "users".

Re: OpenAI faces complaint to FTC that seeks suspension of ChatGPT releases

#63
post #62

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> So? Most AI isn't. It's not all consumer products. You are moving the goal posts. Your argument was that non-Tesla AI has killed its users. There were no users of the service mentioned in the article, ergo none of them could have been killed by it. > I can say that about Tesla FSD. The difference is that Tesla FSD is actively used, and its false negatives and positives have actually killed people. My argument was n…

Nah, you're moving them. > Yes. Elon Musk has killed more people with his AI than anyone else has with theirs. That's "people" not "users".

Yes, I'm talking about events that have actually happened. You're talking about hypothetical future deaths.

I don't disagree that eventually, AI will lead to both direct and indirect deaths. But so far, the only direct deaths from AI have been from Tesla AI.

Re: OpenAI faces complaint to FTC that seeks suspension of ChatGPT releases

#64
This complaint seems somewhat unlikely to lead to an actual FTC action. The criticism is about unfair or deceptive business practices under the FTC act. The FTC has a fairly specific definition of what constitutes unfair or deceptive business practises[1]

  >  “Deceptive” practices are defined in the Commission’s Policy Statement on Deception as involving a material representation, omission or practice that is likely to mislead a consumer acting reasonably in the circumstances. An act or practice is “unfair” if it “causes or is likely to cause substantial injury to consumers which is not reasonably avoidable by consumers themselves and not outweighed by countervailing benefits to consumers or to competition.” 

[1] https://www.ftc.gov/about-ftc/mission/enforcement-authority

Re: OpenAI faces complaint to FTC that seeks suspension of ChatGPT releases

#65

It’s really ironic to me that Elon Musk signed a petition to halt LLMs but then uses AI on our roads putting people at risk without issue.

Yes. Elon Musk has killed more people with his AI than anyone else has with theirs.

So you have some stats proving that Tesla cars are more dangerous or crash more often than other cars? With so many Teslas on the road, there must be an obvious spike if AI is making them more dangerous than the baseline of all cars.

Re: OpenAI faces complaint to FTC that seeks suspension of ChatGPT releases

#66
post #2

What do they expect to happen if they win? OpenAI can't use GPT-4 (or build/release GPT-5), but the innovation will continue in areas of the world not subject to this regular? I understand that the LLM models are advancing quickly and aren't easily explainable or transparent. The models feel like magic at times. But that doesn't mean society should shut them down. This is fearful behavior and spreading FUD really. Th…

These models are nakedly dangerous, even a cursory glance suggests this.

Re: OpenAI faces complaint to FTC that seeks suspension of ChatGPT releases

#67

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Your argument is companies should be allowed to do anything they like, because there will be another country where they can abuse with impunity?

I think the argument is that no harm has actually been shown and there is no legal reason to have one of the fastest growing companies hamstrung while Big Tech gets it's shit together.

It's a terrible argument.

The harm is transparent and greatly eclipses most other threats to cybersecurity.

Re: OpenAI faces complaint to FTC that seeks suspension of ChatGPT releases

#68
post #55
post #2

What do they expect to happen if they win? OpenAI can't use GPT-4 (or build/release GPT-5), but the innovation will continue in areas of the world not subject to this regular? I understand that the LLM models are advancing quickly and aren't easily explainable or transparent. The models feel like magic at times. But that doesn't mean society should shut them down. This is fearful behavior and spreading FUD really. Th…

> I understand that the LLM models are advancing quickly and aren't easily explainable or transparent. The models feel like magic at times. This is exactly why LLMs aren't useful or trustworthy for anything serious other than the niche of summarization of existing text. Even with that, you have to keep checking that it isn't hallucinating or bullshitting. > These folks should take the time to understand how an LLM wo…

GPT-4 is basically magic when it comes to code. Have you used it?

Re: OpenAI faces complaint to FTC that seeks suspension of ChatGPT releases

#69

It’s really ironic to me that Elon Musk signed a petition to halt LLMs but then uses AI on our roads putting people at risk without issue.

At least AI recognizes what Teslas really are. Try to compare a Tesla to a serial killer on Bing

Re: OpenAI faces complaint to FTC that seeks suspension of ChatGPT releases

#70

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think the argument is that no harm has actually been shown and there is no legal reason to have one of the fastest growing companies hamstrung while Big Tech gets it's shit together.

It's a terrible argument. The harm is transparent and greatly eclipses most other threats to cybersecurity.

Please list the harm that has been done. I do not see it as transparent.
Post reply on HN