Intersting, however, there is something about this format of headline that always makes me twitch a bit inside. There should be a law of scientific headlines, something along the lines: Whenever a reporter writes, "Scientists finally discover why...." you can be sure to interpret as "Scientists have even more questions about why...". The phrasing confuses the understanding of the general public about how sciences and…
Scientists finally figure out why the water bear is nearly indestructible (2017)
61–70 of 99 posts
Re: Scientists finally figure out why the water bear is nearly indestructible (2017)
#62Earlier quoted context omitted.
Climate has been changing since the planet exists and you benefit from everything that a modern society has to offer. Better if you become the example of change in society and go live inside a cave to reduce your own carbon footprint.
https://xkcd.com/1732/
Not that long ago that parts of the globe were for centuries warmer up to 5 degree celsius and then fallen into a mini ice-age: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medieval_Warm_Period
Reality is quite cold, literally.
Re: Scientists finally figure out why the water bear is nearly indestructible (2017)
#63Earlier quoted context omitted.
https://xkcd.com/1732/
Instead of comics, better understand that climate has always changed and will continue to change. Not that long ago that parts of the globe were for centuries warmer up to 5 degree celsius and then fallen into a mini ice-age: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medieval_Warm_Period Reality is quite cold, literally.
Re: Scientists finally figure out why the water bear is nearly indestructible (2017)
#64Re: Scientists finally figure out why the water bear is nearly indestructible (2017)
#65> If you take those genes and put them into organisms like bacteria and yeast, which normally do not have these proteins, they actually become much more desiccation-tolerant Well I have a newfound fear of humans creating a bacteria as hard to kill as a tardigrade…
The real question is, if these genes are spliced into a human do they awaken post-dessication craving human blood? :)
Re: Scientists finally figure out why the water bear is nearly indestructible (2017)
#66Re: Scientists finally figure out why the water bear is nearly indestructible (2017)
#67Earlier quoted context omitted.
The one in my quote, that's used in multiple places in the very article...?
I think it's a pedantic attempt to bring up the whole "initialism vs acronym" thing. You know, kinda thing that makes you real fun at parties.
I guess that's because it's barely used:
https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=acronym%2Cinit...
Maybe some people have tried to push it as a new word in common usage but they don't appear to have succeeded.
Re: Scientists finally figure out why the water bear is nearly indestructible (2017)
#68Re: Scientists finally figure out why the water bear is nearly indestructible (2017)
#69> If you take those genes and put them into organisms like bacteria and yeast, which normally do not have these proteins, they actually become much more desiccation-tolerant Well I have a newfound fear of humans creating a bacteria as hard to kill as a tardigrade…
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pseudomonas_aeruginosa
Eventually we'll get to a point where nothing will work against these
Re: Scientists finally figure out why the water bear is nearly indestructible (2017)
#70Earlier quoted context omitted.
https://xkcd.com/1732/
Instead of comics, better understand that climate has always changed and will continue to change. Not that long ago that parts of the globe were for centuries warmer up to 5 degree celsius and then fallen into a mini ice-age: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medieval_Warm_Period Reality is quite cold, literally.
Saying climate always changed so it's ok is like saying you'll die eventually so it's ok if you die tomorrow
> better understand that climate has always changed and will continue to change.
I think virtually no one ever argued against that: https://skepticalscience.com/print.php?r=48