61–70 of 81 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
gpt4: months in alphabetical order Here are the months in alphabetical order: April August December February January July June March May November October September
I've never seen the months listed in alphabetical order before. And it's absolutely breaking my brain. Which is a reaction I did not expect. It looks so wrong .
Earlier quoted context omitted.
You're making the assumption that quality is the only feature that matters, rather than it being a multi- dimensional tradeoff where we don't know at all what tradeoffs consumers actually prefer. For example, a smaller model will run faster, right? At this exact moment, ChatGPT is giving me about a word every 2-3 seconds. It's basically useless. But even when the system is not overloaded, there's a noticeable delay.…
Try Bing though, based on GPT-4. That's their real competition, and it beats the pants off Google.
Too little too late, and even the wrong focus topic to survive as a company. Google is done. No one cares anymore what google does, its either inferior to alternatives and/or on the graveyard soon anyways. Time to move on.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
gpt4: months in alphabetical order Here are the months in alphabetical order: April August December February January July June March May November October September
A google search returns about 10,200 results for this, gpt4 probably picked up this sequence as well during the training.
Sorting months by the second letter, we get the following order:
1. April 2. January 3. June 4. July 5. March 6. May 7. February 8. December 9. November 10. September 11. August 12. October
I've been using ChatGPT a lot for various tasks and found the results very helpful. There are often errors but errors that I would make. With non programming tasks it can sometimes be word association and misstate the concept but it's almost always helpful and again the mistakes are reasonable. When I asked Bard to list the months in alphabetical order, it failed to do so. I saw this on a tweet but confirmed that it…
That's pretty surprising it can't do the months in alphabetical order. I just tried with LLaMA 30B. This is running on my MacBook Air with llama.cpp, quantized to 4 bits, and is a "raw" model (not alpaca / instruction tuned at all). Obviously some models will be better at some things (and will have different outputs given the same inputs) and worse at other, but you'd think Bard would be able to do that pretty simple…
> User: That's not in alphabetical order. Redo.
> Bob: Sorry about that. Here are the months again, this time in alphabetical order: April, August, December, February, July, June, March, May, November, October, September.
(Also LLaMA, 30B, llama.cpp on x86 Processor)
At least LLaMA sees its mistake and doesn't gaslight you (in this case). "I've been a good LLaMA." ;P
Earlier quoted context omitted.
gpt4: months in alphabetical order Here are the months in alphabetical order: April August December February January July June March May November October September
I've never seen the months listed in alphabetical order before. And it's absolutely breaking my brain. Which is a reaction I did not expect. It looks so wrong .
The first major noticeable improvement is Bard is way more human like in it response. ChatGPT often spends time writing thing it doesn't need to write.
For example, If you ask them: "If you had to pick one movie to watch today what would you pick?"
Bard give you one single movie, "The Shawshank Redemption", and explains in depth why it liked the movie.
ChatGPT gives you boilerplate response saying it can't have an opinion because it an AI and then lists 5 popular movies with basic explanation of the movie. Not very useful.
A lot of the time using ChatGPT I'm waiting for it to get to the answer I'm looking for because it spends a lot of time writing useless text instead of being more human like and understanding what the user really want in the answer.
I know a lot of people shit on Google because they hate Google, but this is a good product if they can solve some of the bad knowledge but it's more impressive than ChatGPT IMHO simply because they are wiling to allow it to learn new data all the time. While ChatGPT is still using the same dataset from 2021.
I've been rather unimpressed with Bard when asking it "common sense" type of information. It's limited memory is also a problem when trying to have a meaningful conversation with depth. I spent a few hours last night trying to work on a story outline with Bard's help and while individual responses were sometimes okay, Bard regularly forgot about plot points and character traits we decided on earlier in the conversati…
It already did a pretty good job of embarrassing them, social media is full of Bard failure screenshots. It couldn't even write a Javascript function to add two numbers.
You can not join, when you have a commercial account (like me using google workspace). Wow! Thanks Google!