Live data from Hacker News

The End of Silicon Valley (Bank)

stratechery.com

61–70 of 145 posts

Re: The End of Silicon Valley (Bank)

#61
post #19

I have this innovative idea for business. Imagine you charge money from depositors for keeping their money in a big safe vault. No trading or lending their money. You just keep it safe.

I dont know a great many who would pay for that service.

I imagine that people are paying for insurance for these kind of things. A less risky bank is worth at least a fraction of that.

Re: The End of Silicon Valley (Bank)

#62

I have this innovative idea for business. Imagine you charge money from depositors for keeping their money in a big safe vault. No trading or lending their money. You just keep it safe.

I can go buy a fireproof safe for a few hundred bucks. Or rent a safe deposit box. My money becomes less valuable the longer it sits in either.

Your money becomes less valuable in a bank too, as a bank account is not an investment vehicle anyway. It's just that now you also have the added risk of the bank defaulting like SVB.

If you want to invest, invest. If you don't, you shouldn't have the added risk tied to your "sitting in the bank" money, just inflation.

Re: The End of Silicon Valley (Bank)

#65
post #2

>The federal government’s action is, in my estimation, the right thing to do for this moment in time. There will, though, be long-term consequences for fundamentally changing the nature of a bank: remember, depositors are a bank’s creditors, who are compensated for lending money to the bank; if there is no risk in lending that money, why should depositors make anything? Banks, meanwhile, are now motivated to pursue e…

Limits were not "ignored", the companies simply have no other choice. The problem is systematic and by design. A medium sized startup/business handling only 25 million would need to bank with 100 different banks, obviously that's inconceivable in practice. And now look at some of the more prominent customers. Pinterest, Shopify, CrowdStrike Holdings, Beyond Meat, Andreessen Horowitz, Founder's Fund, Circle. The latte…

The article describes exactly what the safe choice is: short term treasuries. The option that SIVB ignored in order to yield chase.

Re: The End of Silicon Valley (Bank)

#66

I have this innovative idea for business. Imagine you charge money from depositors for keeping their money in a big safe vault. No trading or lending their money. You just keep it safe.

So by keeping my money with you I lose spending power at a rate of your fees PLUS inflation? Where do I sign up?

It's not that weird. It's basically a checking account. Lot of countries those have fees attached. It's also the historical origin of banks. strong men with vaults to store your coins. It's no longer attractive because of fiat currency, which has strong inflatuonary pressure; and because of the fish-in-water effect of two centuries of capitalism, people no longer can distinguish between savings and capital, the divider between those two conc3pts is no longer part of the mental model of forms of wealth.

Re: The End of Silicon Valley (Bank)

#67
post #42

Earlier quoted context omitted.

So by keeping my money with you I lose spending power at a rate of your fees PLUS inflation? Where do I sign up?

Well in that case you must be ok with losing money that comes with the risk. Which many people surely are not ok with(Want bailouts). Makes perfect sense to me. If you are ok with the risk of losing it all. You go in for an investment vehicle. Or you go in for a vault.

Or I understand the insured limits on my accounts and make arrangements accordingly.

Re: The End of Silicon Valley (Bank)

#68
post #27

Has the low cost of online banking removed the need for fractional reserve banking? Why does a basic checking account need to have economy destroying risks?

Because money. Yes to any reasonable person your bank account is money not intended for gambling, but that's not how bankers see it. They're in an industry where appearance is everything.

As long as you drive a Tesla and never have to cook in your Italian marble kitchen (I don't know and don't care if it's a thing, just making a point) it doesn't matter if it's all debt. The entire point of our economy is to kick it downhill and have someone else pay for it.

Nothing grows indefinitely, we all know this, but we pretend economy is different.

Re: The End of Silicon Valley (Bank)

#69
post #50

Out of curiosity, did anyone ever believe the "rainforest" metaphor for Silicon Valley, that entrepreneurs and investors were more interested in global/"community" success than their own individual wins, and that they wouldn't react egotistically when real money was at stake? Stratechery asserts this was "probably true" in 2012 but not longer true, and that Uber was one of the first cases where short term/individual…

You'd be surprised how many naive people exist, when it comes to such empty promises...

It's why all SV companies say their mission is "to change the world" and such BS

Re: The End of Silicon Valley (Bank)

#70
post #66

Earlier quoted context omitted.

So by keeping my money with you I lose spending power at a rate of your fees PLUS inflation? Where do I sign up?

It's not that weird. It's basically a checking account. Lot of countries those have fees attached. It's also the historical origin of banks. strong men with vaults to store your coins. It's no longer attractive because of fiat currency, which has strong inflatuonary pressure; and because of the fish-in-water effect of two centuries of capitalism, people no longer can distinguish between savings and capital, the divid…

I have a checking account. I only keep a small portion of my money in there.
Post reply on HN