Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's all well and good to disagree with the policy, or the choice of the word "illegal". Had Gary Lineker done so, we wouldn't have heard a peep. But he called it Nazi rhetoric, which is hysterical, divisive and harmful to the public discourse. > If people are crossing the channel to apply for asylum, then I don't see how it can be determined that they are illegal. Intentionally circumventing legal entry points when…
You don’t seem to do anything here except for spout right wing rhetoric. Perhaps you’ll find yourself more at home on parler or on the stormfront forums than here.
If you can't make a substantive contribution to the conversation, perhaps silence would suffice? This sort of surly mud-slinging is unbecoming.