Live data from Hacker News

Stripe can completely ruin your 6-figure business in one minute

twitter.com

61–63 of 63 posts

Re: Stripe can completely ruin your 6-figure business in one minute

#61
post #58
post #39

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not verifying the legitimacy of the merchant making the transaction. Banking and payments are very tightly regulated and there are AML-KYC laws (anti-money-laundering/know-your-customer) that need to be complied with.

It's a sad state of affairs when things not verified to be legal are presumed illegal.

Say you buy a bicycle helmet for your kid.

2 are available. Helmet A mentions its certifications. Helmet B doesn't, but claims to be as safe.

Would you consider helmet B?

Re: Stripe can completely ruin your 6-figure business in one minute

#62
post #58

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's a sad state of affairs when things not verified to be legal are presumed illegal.

Say you buy a bicycle helmet for your kid. 2 are available. Helmet A mentions its certifications. Helmet B doesn't, but claims to be as safe. Would you consider helmet B?

The conversation was about reducing privacy to assist law enforcement. Your question relates to whether a lawful society is preferable to a lawless one, and as far as I can tell has no bearing on privacy.

I'd be happy to answer your hypothetical question, but I don't want to stray further off topic, so I'll decline.

Re: Stripe can completely ruin your 6-figure business in one minute

#63
post #62

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Say you buy a bicycle helmet for your kid. 2 are available. Helmet A mentions its certifications. Helmet B doesn't, but claims to be as safe. Would you consider helmet B?

The conversation was about reducing privacy to assist law enforcement. Your question relates to whether a lawful society is preferable to a lawless one, and as far as I can tell has no bearing on privacy. I'd be happy to answer your hypothetical question, but I don't want to stray further off topic, so I'll decline.

You're dodging.

The discussion and your point was about presumption of lawfulness and I made an analogy about presumption of safety.

Post reply on HN