Live data from Hacker News

“Pigeon Neck” Illusion (2014)

michaelbach.de

61–70 of 82 posts

Re: “Pigeon Neck” Illusion (2014)

#61
post #57
post #20

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I let out a verbal "what the fuck" when I tried this. Same exact thing as you, it's absolutely striking.

I was confused as well. First impression: nothing. Get up and look with both eyes and there it was. Interesting stuff.

For me, if I focus intensely on the head, the neck stops moving. When I relax, and the reference naturally changes to the lines in the background, the neck begins moving again.

Re: “Pigeon Neck” Illusion (2014)

#62
post #17

I was in bed reading this with an eye closed and was very confused until I discovered the illusion works for me only when I watch it with both eyes open. I found this surprising—I know three dimensional optical illusions depend on focus and perspective, but I was unaware two dimensional optical illusions were as well.

Worked a bit better for me with one eye closed. Weird.

Re: “Pigeon Neck” Illusion (2014)

#63
post #56

Earlier quoted context omitted.

So you can see it with zero eyes open? ;) I also see it with any number (>= 1) of eyes open and at any angle. Wonder if GP's phone was on night shift or something similar - the article mentions that color changes impact the illusion's visibility.

No night shift, for what it’s worth. Another commenter mentioned astigmatism, which I do have. I was not wearing my glasses at the time. Curious to see if anybody with expertise on the topic of optics or visual perception chimes in with some insight.

Interesting, I have astigmatism so I tried it without my glasses and with both one and two eyes open at different angles and I still see the illusion (with no change in intensity of the “bobbing”)

Re: “Pigeon Neck” Illusion (2014)

#64
post #44

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Play with the color of the pigeons. Slide it all the way to black, and it's no longer an illusion - the edges really do move in steps. Slide it all the way to white and the same effect appears in the inverse. Somewhere in between, there are shades of gray where the smooth movement of the pigeons is visible. And there are shades of gray where your brain can't separate it from the underlying black motion. That's intere…

> Slide it all the way to black For the record: the illusion still works for me if I slide the color all the way to black. One eye, both eyes, it always works for me.

Not really - he's saying when it's fully black there is no illusion. The chicken is really moving like that.

Re: “Pigeon Neck” Illusion (2014)

#65

I don’t feel this is much of an illusion. I think you just can’t see the movement of gray on black. Or maybe this is what illusions are in a very simple form?

I'm confused what you think an illusion is?

Something that relies on unexpected or weird characteristics of the human visual system.

This just relies on poor contrast.

Re: “Pigeon Neck” Illusion (2014)

#66
post #38

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I... only see it happening with either both eyes or my right eye... My left eye is immune? This is uncanny...

Sounds like your perception can't exactly be pigeonholed . Boom, baby.

your taxi to the nearest wormhole awaits..

Re: “Pigeon Neck” Illusion (2014)

#68
This seems to be, for lack of a better analogy, an effect of rounding colour intensities in the "motion compensation" processing of the brain. The grey and black become perceived as identical and thus no motion is detected in those areas where the two colours are overlapping.
Post reply on HN