Live data from Hacker News

Carta lays off 10% of the workforce

news.ycombinator.com

61–70 of 90 posts

Re: Carta lays off 10% of the workforce

#61
post #32

Carta always talks about how it imagines itself as a sports team. When the team is doing badly, don't they usually fire the head coach? I guess they aren't willing to take the analogy that far, they just like the bit about expecting everyone to be a superstar.

Who said Carta was performing poorly? A more apt analogy is that the franchise's budget just got slashed by 10%, so now they need to rearrange the talent budget... This happens all the time in sports teams too.

Re: Carta lays off 10% of the workforce

#62
post #27

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Seriously? Look at their other severance benefits. Besides if you need an attorney for an immigration case it would be a massive amount of hours. The 30 minutes consultation is helpful to decide if you need to pursue a case. I can't believe with all they are giving you still had to shit on it somehow.

Tell me you never dealt with US visa system without telling me you never dealt with US visa system

I haven't, what about my point changes if I did. I acknowledged it's expensive.

Re: Carta lays off 10% of the workforce

#63
post #32

Carta always talks about how it imagines itself as a sports team. When the team is doing badly, don't they usually fire the head coach? I guess they aren't willing to take the analogy that far, they just like the bit about expecting everyone to be a superstar.

They fired and sued the CEO, which means they should probably have noticed something before having to fire 10% of the company.

Re: Carta lays off 10% of the workforce

#64
post #39
post #27

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Tell me you never dealt with US visa system without telling me you never dealt with US visa system

I've had at least half a dozen US visas (J-1, TN, H-1B, plus renewals, then EAD and now permanent residency). I would have appreciated this benefit if I'd been laid off.

The only tangible benefit would be to keep people on payroll instead of severance which would more than double the time they have available to find the next job

Re: Carta lays off 10% of the workforce

#65
post #11

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I was about to ask the same thing. Why would someone leave voluntarily for worse benefits?

Suppose you wanted to leave. There are 2 choices: A) Voluntarily leave and get some sort of severance. B) Wait and gamble that the company decides to ask you to leave. If you wait and are not selected to leave, you likely won't get any severance. So if you are angling to leave, it's safer to just take the package.

Great explanation. Probably where I am from there are more statutory or other costs involved in non-voluntary redundancy so it makes more sense to incentivise anyone to leave who wants to do so.

Re: Carta lays off 10% of the workforce

#67
post #16

I always wondered how American companies lay off European employees (when the companies have branches in European countries). Usually, in Europe, you cannot just fire someone without a justified reason (and no, saving costs is not a justified reason). Such reason are usually: the employee did something illegal (data leaks, sell internal information, etc.) or something related to harassing other employees. Even with b…

I have been involved (from a Senior management perspective) in one significant layoff that affected US and UK employees. How we did it in that case is we took legal advice about what was the minimum requirement, and then leveled-up/adjusted from there to try to be as generous as we could. Layoffs are certainly possible even within the framework of EU labour law, but employees have more rights and depending on how big you are there may be additional requirements (eg in large companies in continental Europe I believe labour representatives have to be involved in the planning of the layoff etc).

The exact specifics of the deal in our case were a little different for US and UK folks because of things like how healthcare works in the US being so completely awful so you have to figure out things like COBRA which would just not be a thing in Europe. That forced us to adjust things to make it equitable/equivalent for both US and UK folks, but we really tried our best to be fair to everyone.

While the base requirements are much higher in the UK/Europe than in the US if you have teams in both places, you should do whatever you can to offer broadly the same deal to both teams. Besides your basic duty as a human to be fair to people, note that your remaining employees will judge you based on how you treated their departing colleagues.

Re: Carta lays off 10% of the workforce

#68
post #20

Earlier quoted context omitted.

better than nothing, in my opinion. At least they were considered.

this is worth, like $500. would have looked better if they didn't even have this at all.

less than that. I see $250 as an hour for many immigration lawyers so this is like $125.

Re: Carta lays off 10% of the workforce

#69
post #64
post #39

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I've had at least half a dozen US visas (J-1, TN, H-1B, plus renewals, then EAD and now permanent residency). I would have appreciated this benefit if I'd been laid off.

The only tangible benefit would be to keep people on payroll instead of severance which would more than double the time they have available to find the next job

There's a new ruling for H-1B visa holder with I-140 approved.

Re: Carta lays off 10% of the workforce

#70
post #19

For the RSUs. Is there a buy-back program for shares? Taxes on these far out weigh the benefit. Carta with $150m of revenue is not worth over $1B and is closer to $500m if it went public right now. Use other fintechs that went public for comparison like Robinhood, Coinbase, Toast etc.

Most RSUs are double trigger and don't trigger taxes till an actual liquidity event

Not here. Single trigger.
Post reply on HN