Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not being sarcastic, but have to you considered Flickr or SmugMug (the company that bought Flickr)?
Yeah, I don’t get it why people speak about it in past tense. It’s still a great service, it still has great content (better than any other TBH) and you’re not the product — it’s a service you pay for, and there are no ads.
Sorry, wasn't clear I was referring to Facebook, not Flickr. I just meant I was pining for a photo sharing service with Facebook's network effect.