Earlier quoted context omitted.
> What if Google was pro SOPA? Would you be happy with them advertising for it on their front page? You're writing that as if SOPA was one side of an argument where good people could reasonably be on either one side or the other, and HN and Google just happens to be on the same. But it's not, SOPA has a right and a wrong side. We're on the right side, Google is on the right side and good people are either uninformed…
"My opinion is right because I say it is. Anyone who doesn't hold the same opinion is either bad, or needs educating" Well, that's me convinced.
Google: Let it snow
61–70 of 101 posts
Re: Google: Let it snow
#62Eats one cpu core for me and makes the fan blow loudly. Which is why I never like these things.
Re: Google: Let it snow
#63Ah, reminds me of another search trick that doesn't work any more -- make fart noises and voice recognition recognizes it as New York.
Re: Google: Let it snow
#64Earlier quoted context omitted.
"My opinion is right because I say it is. Anyone who doesn't hold the same opinion is either bad, or needs educating" Well, that's me convinced.
If you actually need convincing that SOPA is wrong and are not just being unnecessarily argumentative, then I really don't know what to say to you... Do you know what SOPA is ?
Re: Google: Let it snow
#65Earlier quoted context omitted.
Exactly. Why do people want yet another hugely rich corporation using their money to interfere in politics? What if Google was pro SOPA? Would you be happy with them advertising for it on their front page? America needs to learn to govern it's self without the intervention of corporations. America doesn't need more of them getting involved.
That's very idealistic but isn't really a really good perspective of the situation facing us. Whatever resistance to SOPA that exists in the federal government exists because of some technology companies making very loud noises. Simply saying, "well, corporations shouldn't have a privileged voice in government at all, so we should condemn corporations even when they're arguing on the right side of an issue" is stabbi…
I'd go a step further and advocate pushing to get ALL the money out of politics. That said, with the way things work at this very moment, anti-SOPA needs all the corporate sponsorship it can get.
My hope is that people will once again be the biggest voice in government instead of corporations.
Re: Google: Let it snow
#66Earlier quoted context omitted.
Firefox takes one core, while Chrome seems to split it across two cores, with a lower combined CPU utilization. I'm using the Nightly's for both browsers. With open source technology we get multiple implementations and a lot more people working to improve the technology.
> multiple implementations Remember Android fragmentation? Talk about open source as golden hammer to solve problems.
Having a real choice is great in my opinion, and having three mainstream browsers (one open, one mostly open, and one totally closed) to choose between is awesome.
Re: Google: Let it snow
#67Why is this on top of Hacker News? What is amazing about this?
Re: Google: Let it snow
#68Earlier quoted context omitted.
If you actually need convincing that SOPA is wrong and are not just being unnecessarily argumentative, then I really don't know what to say to you... Do you know what SOPA is ?
I don't need convincing. I am aware that it is a bad thing. I am also aware that Google getting involved is a bad thing. I am also aware that the people on the other side of the argument aren't necessarily bad or uneducated people like the person I was replying to claimed.