Live data from Hacker News

Snap Store administrators removed signal-desktop from Ubuntu Snap

forum.snapcraft.io

61–70 of 443 posts

Re: Snap Store administrators removed signal-desktop from Ubuntu Snap

#61
post #30

Well, I have been using Ubuntu for many years. This kind of thing, centralizing packages and removing one without explanation etc makes me think I should move on. I suppose the alternative is to switch to Debian? Or maybe there is something totally different that is becoming popular that I don't know about yet?

Pop is nice for plug and play.

Manjaro or mint too.

Re: Snap Store administrators removed signal-desktop from Ubuntu Snap

#62
post #3

This is not a good look. The snap has been gone for almost a month, with seemingly no information given to the maintainer or users about why, except a belated "we removed it for policy reasons" 21 days ago. And if this happens to maintainers associated with Snapcrafters , imagine how you're treated if you're just some random person or company who maintains your own snap. This is the sort of reason why people are conc…

While this incident isn't good, I still think the setup is a ton better than Flathub, where you have flatpaks being maintained by third parties with no relationship to the software vendors. For example, all of the Jetbrains snaps are managed by a volunteer, as is Zoom (!)

Compromise one of those devs' personal computers, and you've now got a path to getting a backdoor out to everybody using those. I trust Canonical's security team over random volunteers.

Re: Snap Store administrators removed signal-desktop from Ubuntu Snap

#63
post #15

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That's funny, because in accordance with my policy I delete snap immediately after install.

My new policy is to just install Debian instead.

This has been my policy since Debian Potato.

Why fix what ain't broke?

Re: Snap Store administrators removed signal-desktop from Ubuntu Snap

#64
post #37

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Also certbot, shame on you for removing the Debian repository in favor of snap. Yes, this deserves shaming. > https://certbot.eff.org/instructions > The Certbot snap supports the x86_64, ARMv7, and ARMv8 architectures. While we strongly recommend that most users install Certbot through the snap, you can find alternate installation instructions here. Shame on you, certbot and EFF. Of all people, I expected better fr…

Debian has it too: https://packages.debian.org/sid/certbot And even Ubuntu: https://packages.ubuntu.com/kinetic/certbot Though I guess there's a risk that eventually the Ubuntu package becomes a facade package like Chrome is, that has no content but uses a postinstall script to grab you the snap instead.

versions in debian and ubuntu repo's have a tendency to lag behind, current version seems to be 1.30.x while in debian and ubuntu repos it's on 1.29.x

Re: Snap Store administrators removed signal-desktop from Ubuntu Snap

#65
Signal Snap Maintainer here, this is because of a DMCA takedown request from lawyers representing Signal. Canonical is currently working with them to clear things up.

Canonical's communication to me was initially lacking due to issues in their process, the process has been amended and I'm back in the loop again.

Re: Snap Store administrators removed signal-desktop from Ubuntu Snap

#66
post #31
post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Because that doesn't solve the discovery problem. People want an easy way to find new things. Whether that's `apt search` or Google Play.

Do Linux users installing software actually have a "discovery problem"? The usual solution is to go to google.com and find in-depth information on the options available for a given class of software, with user reviews, notes on strengths and shortcomings, etc. I have never visited a store first on a desktop OS, and even average users of mobile OS' that I know will fire up Google first if they're actually trying to fi…

Absolutely, when I want to find something, the first thing I will do is DNF search. It's amazing how much you can find and so quickly. It sorts in a smart way as well, where exact matches will appear first, then partial matches on the package name, and then metadata. This makes it quick and easy to see if what I want is there.

When searching on Google, I have to look through a bunch of crappy results from SEO optimized crap. Then when I find something that looks interesting, I have to see if it's packaged for Fedora or not. If not, then I have to hunt down either a GitHub page or look for a RPM file or a flat pack or app image. I won't use a snap even if it's the only distribution method.

There's also a very convenient way of checking for popularity, which doesn't necessarily mean it's a bad pic, but if the package is popular enough that somebody has packaged it for Fedora and maintains the package, there's a very high chance that it will work as needed.

If you don't currently check the apt or DNF repos first, I would definitely recommend doing so.

Re: Snap Store administrators removed signal-desktop from Ubuntu Snap

#67

I'm being slightly offtopic here but I really dislike how slow Firefox is to launch since it became a snap package as a default on Ubuntu 22.04. I know I can uninstall the Firefox snap and install it through APT, but I imagine more and more packages will become snaps by default on Ubuntu. And finding out now that it's possible that snaps are part of a walled garden, just like app/play stores are is really bumming me…

Switching distros is pretty easy. Debian is a classic that will support KDE and will be familiar in some other ways.

If you're writing software, the switch will be a great way to see that your code is robust and not too closely coupled to the peculiarities of Ubuntu. Portability may not be an explicit goal but it turns out to have some benefits.

Re: Snap Store administrators removed signal-desktop from Ubuntu Snap

#68
post #30

Well, I have been using Ubuntu for many years. This kind of thing, centralizing packages and removing one without explanation etc makes me think I should move on. I suppose the alternative is to switch to Debian? Or maybe there is something totally different that is becoming popular that I don't know about yet?

Discussed recently in another story, but many including me like Pop!_OS as a better version of Ubuntu.

I tried Pop before, eventually ran into a compatibility issue. Also it's based on Ubuntu.

Re: Snap Store administrators removed signal-desktop from Ubuntu Snap

#69
post #3

This is not a good look. The snap has been gone for almost a month, with seemingly no information given to the maintainer or users about why, except a belated "we removed it for policy reasons" 21 days ago. And if this happens to maintainers associated with Snapcrafters , imagine how you're treated if you're just some random person or company who maintains your own snap. This is the sort of reason why people are conc…

While this incident isn't good, I still think the setup is a ton better than Flathub, where you have flatpaks being maintained by third parties with no relationship to the software vendors. For example, all of the Jetbrains snaps are managed by a volunteer, as is Zoom (!) Compromise one of those devs' personal computers, and you've now got a path to getting a backdoor out to everybody using those. I trust Canonical's…

Is the third party maintainer relationship a policy choice by flatpak? or is that just the case because the maintainer built the flatpak first?

Re: Snap Store administrators removed signal-desktop from Ubuntu Snap

#70
post #64

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Debian has it too: https://packages.debian.org/sid/certbot And even Ubuntu: https://packages.ubuntu.com/kinetic/certbot Though I guess there's a risk that eventually the Ubuntu package becomes a facade package like Chrome is, that has no content but uses a postinstall script to grab you the snap instead.

versions in debian and ubuntu repo's have a tendency to lag behind, current version seems to be 1.30.x while in debian and ubuntu repos it's on 1.29.x

bullseye/stable is on 1.12.0
Post reply on HN