Earlier quoted context omitted.
You still have the choice to not use any of their services. You can get pretty far in life despite not using the internet at all.
Well not in all countries. In my country you are required to receive electronic messages from the government as well as to have a government issued ID and authentication system that forces you to have a fairly recent smartphone. For now, it is theoretically possible to use the authentication system without a smartphone but you will have to jump through an awful amount of (artificially imposed) hoops. Not having an in…
A dad took photos of his toddler for a doctor – Google flagged him as a criminal
61–70 of 609 posts
Re: A dad took photos of his toddler for a doctor – Google flagged him as a criminal
#62But they keep insisting that their services and cloud storage is private and secure? Odd.
Re: A dad took photos of his toddler for a doctor – Google flagged him as a criminal
#63> A Google spokeswoman said the company stands by its decisions, even though law enforcement cleared the two men. Wow. Just wow. This is worse than the usual Google's automated screw-ups. In this case, Google was notified of the issue by the NYT. Yet they actively chose to continue to screw over their victims just because they can. > In a statement, Google said, “Child sexual abuse material is abhorrent and we’re com…
If Google wrongly gives an account back, you get a different article: "Google helped child pornographer even after discovering CP in their account". Now that gets attention. That's a scandal that leads to political action, criminal charges, etc.
To be clear, I'm not advocating for how Google behaves. They're a lot more like a utility and probably should be treated like one (alongside the protections and requirements that come of a utility, you don't hear "eletric company stopped serving house since man suspect of CP lives there").
For the responses saying "Well the police cleared them", again I don't disagree. But if you're an executive making this decision you're thinking:
1. We never give back an account in this case and avoid the massive downside risk
2. We go through a lot of work to design a process that will impact a marginal portion of customers and really really hope nobody manages to social engineer themselves past, and pray that no enterprising news outlet/politician tries to make the "Google helped CP person recover their CP story" - they already have a target on their back.
Re: A dad took photos of his toddler for a doctor – Google flagged him as a criminal
#64Earlier quoted context omitted.
Snap chat?
A specific medical oriented app. I’ve had a few virtual appointments where they ask me do I have an iPhone for FaceTime. I do. But what do they do for Android users? Which one of the ten soon to be discontinued Google video conferencing apps would the doctor use?
Re: A dad took photos of his toddler for a doctor – Google flagged him as a criminal
#65controversial opinion: as much as everybody knows that China isn't exactly championing the western way of life and western democratic standards, I keep my private files in a Chinese cloud (backups are kept private in a NAS in my house). Why? Because they are not in contact with our authorities and, frankly, the chances my private files will be of any interest for Chinese authorities are close to zero. Not that I have…
Re: A dad took photos of his toddler for a doctor – Google flagged him as a criminal
#66> A Google spokeswoman said the company stands by its decisions, even though law enforcement cleared the two men. Wow. Just wow. This is worse than the usual Google's automated screw-ups. In this case, Google was notified of the issue by the NYT. Yet they actively chose to continue to screw over their victims just because they can. > In a statement, Google said, “Child sexual abuse material is abhorrent and we’re com…
This is relevant to how outraged one should be by this story. I think it is probably > 1:100000. As such, probably not much outrage is warranted, although it’s obviously not great for this one guy.
Re: A dad took photos of his toddler for a doctor – Google flagged him as a criminal
#67I’ve heard great things about Google Domains but this kind of story is exactly why I probably won’t be using that service. It’s just too risky if you lose everything at once.
Honestly: don't upload unencrypted content to anyone, for exactly this reason. I have cloud backups of family photos, but they're all through restic or rclone with the crypt filter applied. Privacy is about the right to put yourself in context .
Re: A dad took photos of his toddler for a doctor – Google flagged him as a criminal
#68Re: A dad took photos of his toddler for a doctor – Google flagged him as a criminal
#69Re: A dad took photos of his toddler for a doctor – Google flagged him as a criminal
#70Earlier quoted context omitted.
Honestly: don't upload unencrypted content to anyone, for exactly this reason. I have cloud backups of family photos, but they're all through restic or rclone with the crypt filter applied. Privacy is about the right to put yourself in context .
> Privacy is about the right to put yourself in context. Wow. This is a brilliant. Did you come up with this?
Six Words on Privacy