Here in Northern California there are huge swaths of firs that are dead or diseased as a result of drought. When they burn (which they will, at high intensity), they'll release their carbon back into the air. Seems to me that there's an opportunity for someone to sequester a lot of carbon by burying these trees ( https://cbmjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1750-0... ) or by turning them into biochar/bio-oil…
In the SF area, the redwoods are dying off from heat/drought. The pines and oaks are being hit with disease. On balance, the oaks seem to be replacing the redwood forests, but everything is thinning out. The mountain forests in Southern California (near Yosemite, etc) have been burnt out hellscapes for years. Of course, this is all rounding error vs. the loss of 90% of the kelp forest, which many people didn't notice…
Wildfires are destroying California's forest carbon credit reserves, study says
61–64 of 64 posts
Re: Wildfires are destroying California's forest carbon credit reserves, study says
#62Earlier quoted context omitted.
Like spraying them down in PFAS, insecticide, and wrapping them in plastic? Not sure that will go over well long term. Edit: Hope yall realize this was sarcasm and none of these options would sequester the carbon long term.
> Like spraying them down in PFAS, insecticide, and wrapping them in plastic? Then sink them in the ocean.
Aside from weighing it down enough to stop floating, of course.
Re: Wildfires are destroying California's forest carbon credit reserves, study says
#63Re: Wildfires are destroying California's forest carbon credit reserves, study says
#64Earlier quoted context omitted.
Quoted post unavailable.
No one calls CO2 "devil's gas". That's just you trying to create a strawman because you're too weak to interact with reality. Grow up and learn to fight steelmen like an adult, https://www.lesswrong.com/tag/steelmanning .
You see, we have this thing called the Sun which is quite large compared to the Earth & emits quite large amounts of energy which fluctuates in large magnitudes in many different cycles, some of which last > 10000 years. In recorded history, we have a small sample of these cycles. Could CO2 be a lagging effect of rising temperature & not the cause of the rising temperature? The ocean contains CO2 & as the ocean heats up, CO2 is emitted.
It's strange how much confirmation bias some people have with their silver bullet models. Weren't we supposed to not have any more glaciers by now according to some of the models by the esteemed institutions?
Am I steelmanning? CO2 emitted from humans is blamed for drastically changing the climate of the Earth while that big orb in the sky which is now leaving it's "warm period" & has historically been the major cause of climate change is now disregarded by models which have proven unable to predict the future. I'm afraid that I am not steelmanning. I wish I was...Devil Gas is quite the appropriate term. If only we can we exterminate all of that Devil Gas, we can save the planet! We simply need a War on Devil Gas to show it that we mean bu$ine$$...or we simply need to block out the Sun. If you're not with me, you are against the planet.
Yes, I know...I need to grow up and eat ze bugs in ze pod that I will live in because I will own nothing & be happy. Gaia cries everytime I drive my SUV with the AC on eating a juicy burger. The amount of cow farts & rainwatered grass that produced the burger is raising ze temperature causing much anger! I am ashamed. Pass me ze bugs.