Live data from Hacker News

Wikenigma is an encyclopedia for topics with unknown answers

wikenigma.org.uk

61–70 of 77 posts

Re: Wikenigma is an encyclopedia for topics with unknown answers

#61
post #11

While I found the concept interesting, having to request an account through a contact form just to edit an article [1] doesn't really live up to the “wiki” part. [1]: https://wikenigma.org.uk/info/notes_for_contributors/become

In my mind there's nothing about locking editing behind account creation that would discount this in being a wiki.

Only because the wikimedia foundation isn't taking people to court over the trademark. But their original vision was/is a website that is freely editable by the audience.

Re: Wikenigma is an encyclopedia for topics with unknown answers

#62
post #29
post #21

Earlier quoted context omitted.

More recently, "wiki" seems to be a more concrete concept: a collaboratively edited website, managed by its audience [1]. The project references Wikipedia as an inspiration, and I hope it can live up to similar ideals. [1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wiki

> collaboratively edited website Yes, but there are parts of it in terminology awareness gone slightly messy: in 'wikipedia', the educational part is in '-poedia' ("children", hence "learners"); 'wiki-' reflects the concept that the operation on the content must be apt to be quick - which is exactly the direct interpretation that appears in your parent post («a contact form just to edit an article doesn't really live…

Sorry, but the second part, "-pedia" comes from "παιδεία", (all-around) education, not "children".

Re: Wikenigma is an encyclopedia for topics with unknown answers

#63
This is great! Many of my questions on Stack Overflow are unanswered, or answered by me months later. Maybe the unanswered questions could be used to create a scaffolding at Wikenigma:

https://stackoverflow.com/unanswered

https://physics.stackexchange.com/unanswered

...

Looks like Quora doesn't quite get it though:

https://www.quora.com/How-do-you-find-unanswered-questions-o...

I enjoy dabbling in fringe topics, and feel that the greatest danger to understanding is certitude. People get so certain that they know something that all further consideration of the topic ceases and they sit in satisfaction even when answers are contradictory or don't connect to greater understanding. Debating someone who uses circular logic feels like banging one's head against the wall.

On a related note, we need a better framework for metaphysical discussion. I've noticed a huge increase in woo woo phenomena since the pandemic. It's probably just a change in my own attention. But since science and religion can't explain consciousness, I feel that there is more to reality and the mental models we use to understand it than is generally discussed. Wikenigma could use pages on synchronicity, manifestation, placebo, etc:

https://www.wrf.org/complementary-therapies/power-of-mind-pl...

“In a recent study of a new kind of chemotherapy, 30 percent of the individuals in the control group, the group given placebos, lost their hair.”

For the placebo effect to be real, it would mean that the mind creates physical effects in the body. I take it further in my own life by believing that the mind creates the body and possibly the universe around it. Or at least, the mind/body/universe are somehow involved in co-creation. That's heretical to science, but, people experience it every day. So what the heck is that?

Re: Wikenigma is an encyclopedia for topics with unknown answers

#66

Earlier quoted context omitted.

In my mind there's nothing about locking editing behind account creation that would discount this in being a wiki.

Only because the wikimedia foundation isn't taking people to court over the trademark. But their original vision was/is a website that is freely editable by the audience.

Not sure what you're getting at.

Wikimedia Foundation did not invent the word "wiki". They were not the first to apply the word to a collaboratively edited web page. And they do not assert rights to any words that would conflict with "Wikenigma".

https://foundation.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_trademarks

Re: Wikenigma is an encyclopedia for topics with unknown answers

#67
post #39

Always a favourite of mine: we still don’t know how Paracetamol works. https://wikenigma.org.uk/content/medicine/drugs/paracetamol

> Recent research suggests that Paracetamol does have a marginal effect for pain relief - but only in around 25% of individuals - and that its beneficial action in others is due to placeboeffects.

Typical pharmaceutical.

Re: Wikenigma is an encyclopedia for topics with unknown answers

#68

I noticed this on the page about infinity: > Are some infinities larger than others? But didn't Cantor prove the answer to that is "yes" back in the 19th century?

My first thought was that this is an odd wiki to make, as there isn't even consensus on what is known and what is not.

Re: Wikenigma is an encyclopedia for topics with unknown answers

#69

This is great! Many of my questions on Stack Overflow are unanswered, or answered by me months later. Maybe the unanswered questions could be used to create a scaffolding at Wikenigma: https://stackoverflow.com/unanswered https://physics.stackexchange.com/unanswered ... Looks like Quora doesn't quite get it though: https://www.quora.com/How-do-you-find-unanswered-questions-o... I enjoy dabbling in fringe topics, and…

The day science begins to study non-physical phenomena, it will make more progress in one decade than in all the previous centuries of its existence.

Nikola Tesla

Re: Wikenigma is an encyclopedia for topics with unknown answers

#70

Earlier quoted context omitted.

In my mind there's nothing about locking editing behind account creation that would discount this in being a wiki.

Only because the wikimedia foundation isn't taking people to court over the trademark. But their original vision was/is a website that is freely editable by the audience.

Wikimedia didn't invent wikis.

In fact wikipedia has many festures that are completely against the ethos of the first wiki.

Post reply on HN