Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm a fan of Jackson's LOTR, but his Hobbit was almost a complete failure (in my opinion). Radical departures from feel, and yes, plot, of the book.
I found the LOTR movies completely missed the essence and magic of the books and I see them as little more than cliche-ridden hollywood garbage. I can't possibly imagine Tolkien being happy about such depraved debasement of his life's work. The only adaptation of Tolkien's work that I think does justice to it and captures part of Tolkien's spark, are the albums of the Austrian black metal band "Summoning".
Rarely Seen Paintings by J.R.R. Tolkien
61–64 of 64 posts
Re: Rarely Seen Paintings by J.R.R. Tolkien
#62Earlier quoted context omitted.
I first read the Silmarillion 20 years ago and then re-read it last year. What struck me is how short it actually is, compared to the sense of scale that I remembered. Of course the Silmarillion is cherrypicked from decades of manuscripts, so I guess it shouldn't be surprising that it conveys a sense of mythological world-building depth beyond its page count.
Do you recommend reading it or is there a risk it "destroys the mysticism"? Usually I find the worst thing to do in fantasy is to read up on the lore.
Re: Rarely Seen Paintings by J.R.R. Tolkien
#63Earlier quoted context omitted.
Do you recommend reading it or is there a risk it "destroys the mysticism"? Usually I find the worst thing to do in fantasy is to read up on the lore.
Oh no, it's definitely enhances! It's not merely descriptive of what happened, and it doesn't break the fourth wall or step out of the story. As much as LOTR was the tale of the Ring collected, compiled, and related essentially by Bilbo and Frodo, The Silmarillion is the creation stories assembled by the elves and first men. It's very in-world.
Thanks that is what I wanted to hear.
Re: Rarely Seen Paintings by J.R.R. Tolkien
#64Earlier quoted context omitted.
I first read the Silmarillion 20 years ago and then re-read it last year. What struck me is how short it actually is, compared to the sense of scale that I remembered. Of course the Silmarillion is cherrypicked from decades of manuscripts, so I guess it shouldn't be surprising that it conveys a sense of mythological world-building depth beyond its page count.
Do you recommend reading it or is there a risk it "destroys the mysticism"? Usually I find the worst thing to do in fantasy is to read up on the lore.