Live data from Hacker News

It is physically impossible to exceed the weight limit for a Small Flat Rate Box

twitter.com

61–70 of 255 posts

Re: It is physically impossible to exceed the weight limit for a Small Flat Rate Box

#61

Since I discovered the availability of anvils on Amazon, I have always wondered about the economics of shipping them. Right now, I can order a 66lb "Happybuy" anvil for $153 with free prime shipping. One assumes that the $153 includes the cost of shipping it all the way from China in the first place. For comparison, a similarly sized anvil from a reputable local dealer costs $949 plus tax and shipping at the lowest r…

That's the best name I can imagine for an anvil.

Re: It is physically impossible to exceed the weight limit for a Small Flat Rate Box

#62
post #18

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"a teaspoon of neutron star material would weigh around a billion tonnes." https://astronomy.swin.edu.au/cosmos/n/neutron+star#:~:text=... .

It would be impossible to put neutron star material inside a cardboard box, and the original post was talking about possibility.

Actually, it too was talking about impossibility (see title); a much stronger assertion and usually wrong.

Re: It is physically impossible to exceed the weight limit for a Small Flat Rate Box

#64
post #19

On the other end of the spectrum is lightweight, but bulky stuff. I sold things like this for a time, some time ago. Would get a fair amount of grief from customers who would use the simpler UPS/Fedex calculators on the weight only and complain that I padding shipping prices. But UPS and Fedex charge "dimensional weight" for these types of shipments, and you have to use a more complicated formula.

> padding shipping prices

Pun of the day.

Re: It is physically impossible to exceed the weight limit for a Small Flat Rate Box

#65
post #10

Semi related - a few months ago, while not fully sober, I was aimlessly browsing through Amazon and ended up owning a set of two 1.5inch cubes - one aluminium, one tungsten. It’s kind of a silly purchase considering it’s a lot of money for 2 metal cubes, but it’s honestly very impressive just how heavy that small cube is - both objectively, and when compared to the aluminium cube. Also makes for a great talking point…

When I heard that the crypto millionaires were buying Tungsten cubes for fun, I checked into the prices. Amazon lists a 1.5" cube (weighs 1 kg) at $199 and a 4" cube (that weighs 18.9 kg [0]) at $3499. There's no way I'm spending that, but I will admit to wanting to experience their density for myself. [0] free Prime shipping for the win

If one can wait for shipping, I recommend ordering (directly?) from Alibaba.

I was able to buy a 2" tungsten cube from Alibaba for $312 after shipping. It was cheaper than any (re)sellers I found on Amazon/eBay/webstores. It came out to 137% more tungsten for only 56% more cost. $39.00 per cubic inch versus $59.26 per cubic inch.

Having it next to an aluminum cube of the same size is fun.

Re: It is physically impossible to exceed the weight limit for a Small Flat Rate Box

#66

An implosion-type nuclear weapon can compress matter to some multiple of the density of osmium. This isn't useful for USPS box packaging; I just think it's neat. edit: Also, inertial confinement fusion plasmas go up to about 1,000 g/cm³, https://aip.scitation.org/doi/full/10.1063/5.0008231 ( "Unified first-principles equations of state of deuterium-tritium mixtures in the global inertial confinement fusion region" )

Can this overcompressed material continue to exist at room temperature and pressure?

It would be remarkable, but I guess it's hard to imagine how that could work.

Re: It is physically impossible to exceed the weight limit for a Small Flat Rate Box

#68
post #59
post #33

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I wish I was a millionaire. I could fulfil my wish of owning replica of IPK that is small cylinder of Platinum-Iridium weighting very very close to kilogram.

IPK?

International Prototype Kilogram, the mass which used to be the reference standard for the kilogram until it was redefined to be based on fundamental constants a few years ago.

Re: It is physically impossible to exceed the weight limit for a Small Flat Rate Box

#69

I have a 115lb shipment of small metal parts that needs to be across the country before Wed. Both FedEx and UPS quoted me ~$750 to ship it in a 12"x8"x8" OSB box via 2-day shipping. Fedex one rate boxes have a weight limit of 50lbs. The small boxes are $31/ea to ship. I just finished breaking the shipment up into 3 parts. Heck, next day would be ~$300.

There's a reason for it. Package sizes and weight limits are optimized for workers who are going to carry them. So yes in your case the total weight loaded on to the truck or plane may be the same, but loading/unloading 3x40 lb boxes and carrying them to your front porch is very different from doing the same with a single 115 lb box.

Airlines work the same way. 2x50 lb bags cost $30 each. One single 100lb bag has a $200 surcharge.

Re: It is physically impossible to exceed the weight limit for a Small Flat Rate Box

#70
post #66

An implosion-type nuclear weapon can compress matter to some multiple of the density of osmium. This isn't useful for USPS box packaging; I just think it's neat. edit: Also, inertial confinement fusion plasmas go up to about 1,000 g/cm³, https://aip.scitation.org/doi/full/10.1063/5.0008231 ( "Unified first-principles equations of state of deuterium-tritium mixtures in the global inertial confinement fusion region" )

Can this overcompressed material continue to exist at room temperature and pressure? It would be remarkable, but I guess it's hard to imagine how that could work.

Not really. But if you ship it sufficiently fast, the en-transit expansion won't be enough to matter.
Post reply on HN