Live data from Hacker News

MaskerAid iOS App

caseyliss.com

61–70 of 177 posts

Re: MaskerAid iOS App

#61
post #26

> There’s several reasons you may want to hide a face: > [...] > * The faces of protestors who are standing up against a grotesque war I don't know if I find this disgustingly opportunistic or a solid gesture of protest and support. Maybe both

Virtue signaling at it's best.

(In this case, there is true virtue - but profoundly unlikely to be safely applied in the use case that exists)

Re: MaskerAid iOS App

#62
post #35

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I've been a professional iOS developer for a decade. 6 months is way too long for that app. My very first app took 10 weeks, including learning to program, and it was more complex than MaskerAid. And better looking, was even featured in the app store in a few countries.

Now let’s say you were already making over a quarter million a year doing one podcast for 3 hours a week. How much effort would you put into an app?

Zero, that's my point. It's a waste of time.

Re: MaskerAid iOS App

#63
post #20

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Personal attacks are a bad look. This sort of nitpicky comment is exactly why people stress about putting stuff on the Internet.

It's not an attack, it's just a statement. If one purpose is to appear employable, he should not mention that it took him 6 months to write it because that is just too long.

When someone says they spent N months on something, that's not total clock time they spent in the code editor. It means they built it over the course of N months. You actually have no idea how long it took them.

Re: MaskerAid iOS App

#64
post #40

Earlier quoted context omitted.

My in-laws foster and this is the first use case I thought of. It’s sad to take a big family photo and either not be able to share it, or have to take a duplicate without the foster child.

Why do you need to do that?

Probably varies by location but here's what Connecticut DCF has to say about it:

> Please refrain from posting any photos or information on social media websites about the child/ren in your care. Their presence in your home should be treated as confidential information is not to be referred to on any social media websites.

https://portal.ct.gov/DCF/CTFosterAdopt/Manual/Chapter2#Scho...

Re: MaskerAid iOS App

#65

the app is simple and clever... tho, you should NOT post personnal stuff on social platforms, do NOT post pictures of your kids ... the internet has become a dreamland for pedos and psychos

So you're saying pedos are going to be jerking off to the image of two kids standing with their mother, possibly on their first day of school?

Re: MaskerAid iOS App

#66
post #45
post #28

Earlier quoted context omitted.

As one of our VCs once wisely said to us: "The hardest thing is to get a consumer to install a new app. Deliver your solution any way other than its own app."

That doesn't sound like it's generalizable. You may as well say, "the hardest thing is to get a consumer to sign up for yet another service". And it is hard. But that is precisely how a new consumer app would get traction. It's not like Buzzfeed where no login is required, and the only thing that matters is ad impressions.

The point is if you can avoid making an app, that's better. Obviously if it has to be an app, then make an app.

Re: MaskerAid iOS App

#67
post #60
post #40

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why do you need to do that?

Speaking as a foster parent: my agency like many have rules against posting foster kids to social media. Usually intended to help protect kid's privacy. I think the motivation comes from a handful of places, protecting kids from being exploited for likes, keeping kids privacy, but a big one in foster circles is so that people don't know you're a foster kid unless you say so. Most adults in the system take great care…

Some of these make sense (not that I agree with them), but don't seem peculiar to foster children. But what does this one mean?

> so that people don't know you're a foster kid unless you say so.

If you post a photo of your family and none of the children have emoji faces, why would anyone conclude that the foster child is a foster child? Because he looks different? Seems to me that emoji:ing out one child would do the opposite, draw attention to him.

EDIT: It seems we are talking about temporary arrangements, then things become clearer. Still very weird photos.

Re: MaskerAid iOS App

#68
post #62

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Now let’s say you were already making over a quarter million a year doing one podcast for 3 hours a week. How much effort would you put into an app?

Zero, that's my point. It's a waste of time.

So you have never done passion projects just to keep your skills up and stay familiar with an ecosystem?

Re: MaskerAid iOS App

#69
post #66
post #45

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That doesn't sound like it's generalizable. You may as well say, "the hardest thing is to get a consumer to sign up for yet another service". And it is hard. But that is precisely how a new consumer app would get traction. It's not like Buzzfeed where no login is required, and the only thing that matters is ad impressions.

The point is if you can avoid making an app, that's better. Obviously if it has to be an app, then make an app.

That too doesn't sound right. Every consumer app I use begs me to use their dedicated native app on mobile. Even though I'm a signed up user on the web site. The only reason they do this is because app-level surveillance and telemetry is unblockable, whereas the web allows me to block what I want.

Re: MaskerAid iOS App

#70
post #52

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Unless you want to hire me or invest, you don't need to make anything of that. Just trust me, 6 months is way too long. Or listen to the cohosts' reaction when he mentions it. Not talking down, just telling it like it is. There is no rule on HN that you may only post laudatory comments. That would make the whole site useless. My point is that if he wants to be employable, he either needs to become more efficient, or…

It was a passion project. I’m sure he wasn’t expecting to make even as much money as he makes from being a cohost on a podcast that charges $5500/ad read * 3 ad reads. I wouldn’t be in a hurry to get it done either.

That's not the impression I got. To me it sounded like he was hoping to earn money from it. He said the same thing about his youtube channel, which also seemed very unlikely.
Post reply on HN