> I'm sorry but I'm not understanding the logic. The booster was recommended after several rounds of research across multiple countries suggested it was a good idea, with Israel doing some of the first testing and reaching the conclusion that it was worthwhile (and it was, by a substantial margin).
You are misinformed. There is a paucity of data supporting boosters, what little exists is for people over 65 (to be fair, the argument in support of boosters seems robust for this group), and the FDA and CDC advisory committees both recommended against boosting of younger populations. They were bypassed. Two long-time FDA scientists resigned over the issue:
https://www.cnn.com/2021/09/13/health/boosters-not-needed-la...
They wrote a scathing review of the situation in the Lancet:
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6...
Paul Offit (inventor of the Rotavirus vaccine, member of CDC ACIP, and vaccine advocate) is on the record saying that he doesn't advise his own 20-something son to get a booster dose:
https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2022/01/should-te...
https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2021/12/omicron-dr-paul-offi...
The headlong rush toward boosters in all age groups is simply not supported by evidence.
(edit: I used the word "mandatory" above; this was a mistake in my own wordering, and I removed it. CDC ACIP recommended that older populations should get a booster, but did not do this for those under 50. I incorrectly summarized this as "recommended against mandatory boosters".)