Whilst thousands of healthcare workers in the US —- those who are supposed to be proponents of public health measures and rational, scientific thinking - refuse to get vaccinated, ultimately resulting in stockpiles of vaccines getting destroyed … people in third world countries cannot get adequate access to vaccines. This is madness.
Courts block two Biden administration Covid vaccine mandates
61–70 of 402 posts
Re: Courts block two Biden administration Covid vaccine mandates
#62Earlier quoted context omitted.
Except that the role of the CMS, as established by congress, is to set the guidelines of care and standards of participation for providers who opt to accept Medicare and Medicaid patients. They set rules for everything from how many hospitals can be owned by a single entity, to what sorts of qualifications are required for hospital administrators, to what types of medical orders are allowed to be given to patients. T…
Sure, that’s the loophole. What’s happening here is yet another end-run around the democratic process. People are tired of emergency powers, executive orders, and delegated authority being used to enact some of the most impactful laws of our time. We want the Schoolhouse Rock version of law-making because we at least get something of a say in it.
I don’t think you understand the role of regulatory agencies in our government.
Re: Courts block two Biden administration Covid vaccine mandates
#63Re: Courts block two Biden administration Covid vaccine mandates
#64Can we add the country in the title please?
Re: Courts block two Biden administration Covid vaccine mandates
#65Earlier quoted context omitted.
Technically, perhaps. But really it's a small government agency whose major task is to disburse oodles of cash to people not employed by it.
Either way, ignorance of the existence of CMS is more indicative of a person's general level of ignorance about the US government. If I was just learning about the existence of CMS, I would at least learn a little more about the basics of the existing US government before making proclamations about how it should operate.
Person on the internet preaches about something they're entirely unqualified to talk about, news at 11.
(To be clear, I agree with you 100%)
Re: Courts block two Biden administration Covid vaccine mandates
#66Earlier quoted context omitted.
> You can agree that its within the federal authority to mandate vaccines, but it really should be a decision made and explicitly endorsed by elected representatives rather than some agency I'm from a country (UK) where parliament has absolute power, but also where the populace largely trusts the civil service. Health decisions, prosecution decisions, and so on are explicitly devolved from the government so that they…
Except in the US, the civil service is politicized and its employees are 95% in favor of one party, as shown by their political donations history.
> Except in the US, the civil service is politicized and its employees are 95% in favor of one party, as shown by their political donations history.
That's not at all generally true historically, even if you drop the made up specific number and say something like “vast majority", of US civil servants; it is true of some states, localities, or agencies, and reversed for others.
2020 looks like that, but the 2020-2021 election and transition cycle were rather outside of historical norms. [0]
There is some historical imbalance, but then, that people who adhere to the party that consistently demonizes government, government work aside from military and law enforcement, and government workers, aside from military and law enforcement don't tend to choose to work for government as much as people who don't adhere to that party is...somewhat unsurprising.
[0] https://www.opensecrets.org/industries/indus.php?ind=W03
Re: Courts block two Biden administration Covid vaccine mandates
#67> Doughty said the CMS lacked the authority to issue a vaccine mandate that would require more than 2 million unvaccinated healthcare workers to get a coronavirus shot. > "There is no question that mandating a vaccine to 10.3 million healthcare workers is something that should be done by Congress, not a government agency," wrote Doughty. That's a good point. You can agree that its within the federal authority to mand…
> Could you imagine a news report about how the much touted vaccine efficacy of 95% didn't really pan out? It didn’t pan out because of Delta, a way more infectious variant that became common well after the 95% figure was determined. And it’s fully accurate to say that despite Delta, the vaccines are effective at preventing severe disease, hospitalization, and death. I think that’s a very good thing!
Anyone who took a biology class and paid attention could have told you that an efficacy-killing variant was an inevitability. Hell, even tinfoil hat Alex Jones said the same thing, and was for that specific instance, vindicated entirely. The top virologists didn't just "not take this into account", they willfully withheld this truth of how viruses operate in order to push a flakey, quickly-deteriorating product into people's arms.
So that "95%" figure was a lie to begin with, because those who touted it knew exactly what was going to happen. Viruses evade, and any non-sterilizing vaccine will be evaded by a virus. This is how you get delta, this is how you get omicron (which, by the way, was first found in fully vaccinated individuals and likely created through this evolutionary pressure).
Thanks
Re: Courts block two Biden administration Covid vaccine mandates
#68> Doughty said the CMS lacked the authority to issue a vaccine mandate that would require more than 2 million unvaccinated healthcare workers to get a coronavirus shot. > "There is no question that mandating a vaccine to 10.3 million healthcare workers is something that should be done by Congress, not a government agency," wrote Doughty. That's a good point. You can agree that its within the federal authority to mand…
Except that the role of the CMS, as established by congress, is to set the guidelines of care and standards of participation for providers who opt to accept Medicare and Medicaid patients. They set rules for everything from how many hospitals can be owned by a single entity, to what sorts of qualifications are required for hospital administrators, to what types of medical orders are allowed to be given to patients. T…
If that's true, how come several federal judges have come to the opposite conclusion in their rulings?
Re: Courts block two Biden administration Covid vaccine mandates
#69Earlier quoted context omitted.
> to what types of medical orders are allowed to be given to patients Suppose an anti-abortion president gets elected and he elects someone as head and tells them that health care providers that accept medicare or medicaid cannot provide abortions. Not making it illegal per-se, but just for the providers that accept medicare or medicaid for any of their services. You okay with this as well?
> Suppose an anti-abortion president gets elected and he elects someone as head and tells them that health care providers that accept medicare or medicaid cannot provide abortions Not comparable. Based on current law, abortion is a Constitutionally-protected right. Based on precedent from the Spanish-flu era, the government has broad public health powers. All that said, as someone who isn’t a fan of how much power Co…
[deleted]
Re: Courts block two Biden administration Covid vaccine mandates
#70Earlier quoted context omitted.
Except that the role of the CMS, as established by congress, is to set the guidelines of care and standards of participation for providers who opt to accept Medicare and Medicaid patients. They set rules for everything from how many hospitals can be owned by a single entity, to what sorts of qualifications are required for hospital administrators, to what types of medical orders are allowed to be given to patients. T…
> to what types of medical orders are allowed to be given to patients Suppose an anti-abortion president gets elected and he elects someone as head and tells them that health care providers that accept medicare or medicaid cannot provide abortions. Not making it illegal per-se, but just for the providers that accept medicare or medicaid for any of their services. You okay with this as well?
The problem I see with this kind of argument is that whether a health care provider provides abortion services has very little (nothing) to do with the care given to a medicaid or medicare patients. Where-as them being vaccinated for COVID does have a very clear impact on medicaid/medicare patients, especially since medicare patients are more likely to be in a high risk group (IE: old).
It seems to me like you just don't think medicare or medicaid should be a thing to begin with. I think it's basic sense that if we're paying for medicare and medicaid we should require the healthcare providers receiving our tax dollars to meet some standard level of care, or else we're just wasting our money. We can argue over what that level of care should be, but I don't think it's all that debatable that requiring things like vaccines could fall into that level of care if not having them is particularly risky for patients.