Earlier quoted context omitted.
China has been waging economic warfare via equity markets for a while now. The U.S. hasn’t done anything to protect investors from billions in losses. Totally embarrassing.
The U.S. shouldn't protect investors from the free market? That's the free market at work. Investors are not entitled to be paid. All investments carry risk.
Evergrande teeters on edge of default as $148M payment falls due
61–70 of 408 posts
Re: Evergrande teeters on edge of default as $148M payment falls due
#62Earlier quoted context omitted.
China has been waging economic warfare via equity markets for a while now. The U.S. hasn’t done anything to protect investors from billions in losses. Totally embarrassing.
A) What do you propose the US do? B) Why should the US do anything? If your risk profile when dealing with Chinese companies doesn't include the risk that the CPC will change the rules of the game later to benefit the domestic economy, you're a sucker.
Of course these options (and probably any other options you imagine) would have pretty wide reaching side effects - to the extent that I'm not even sure they are worth the cost - but they definitely exist.
B) Because transfer of wealth from US investors to China harms US interests, the US government exists to serve US interests and part of that is standing up for their nationals in international trade.
Re: Evergrande teeters on edge of default as $148M payment falls due
#63Isn’t $148 million like four meme NFTs? Why would a large company be teetering on the edge for such a small amount of money?
If they can't pay that, what can they pay on their 300B in other debts?
Other news sources indicate they don't have money coming in, possibly NONE, the real estate market in China is getting cold... and they have unfinished projects that they already collected money on that require money to complete.
Re: Evergrande teeters on edge of default as $148M payment falls due
#64Earlier quoted context omitted.
China has been waging economic warfare via equity markets for a while now. The U.S. hasn’t done anything to protect investors from billions in losses. Totally embarrassing.
The U.S. shouldn't protect investors from the free market? That's the free market at work. Investors are not entitled to be paid. All investments carry risk.
Re: Evergrande teeters on edge of default as $148M payment falls due
#65Earlier quoted context omitted.
China has been waging economic warfare via equity markets for a while now. The U.S. hasn’t done anything to protect investors from billions in losses. Totally embarrassing.
A) What do you propose the US do? B) Why should the US do anything? If your risk profile when dealing with Chinese companies doesn't include the risk that the CPC will change the rules of the game later to benefit the domestic economy, you're a sucker.
B) The US should do something, because if they don't, China will continue to take advantage of US ineptness. States have powers which investors simply don't have.
Re: Evergrande teeters on edge of default as $148M payment falls due
#66Interesting about this is that Evergrande is defaulting only on foreign held debt. Not internal debt after a ccp mandate. If their economy continues its downturn then this precedent would hold for all debt. I would really watch personal funds and investments and insure they dont hold any chinese debt as an asset.
China has been waging economic warfare via equity markets for a while now. The U.S. hasn’t done anything to protect investors from billions in losses. Totally embarrassing.
How is Evergrande's foreign debt default translate to "waging economic warfare via equity markets"? Of course China is responsible for its own domestic debt, because evergrande borrowed from state-backed banks. Are foreign debters also backed by Chinese government? Are you suggesting Chinese government should take responsibility for foreign investors?
And "for a while"? Name another case remotely matches "economic warfare".
Re: Evergrande teeters on edge of default as $148M payment falls due
#67Earlier quoted context omitted.
A) What do you propose the US do? B) Why should the US do anything? If your risk profile when dealing with Chinese companies doesn't include the risk that the CPC will change the rules of the game later to benefit the domestic economy, you're a sucker.
The government should do everything* to protect me, the citizen. *Except the things that make me confused and angry, even if they benefit other citizens. Welcome to neoliberal hell.
The problem with politics is the left knows it's not always right.
Re: Evergrande teeters on edge of default as $148M payment falls due
#68How much exposure does the Western world have to this? My guess would be "not much". It'll sting some emerging market investors, but I don't think you'll see a massive knock-on here.
Re: Evergrande teeters on edge of default as $148M payment falls due
#69Earlier quoted context omitted.
China has been waging economic warfare via equity markets for a while now. The U.S. hasn’t done anything to protect investors from billions in losses. Totally embarrassing.
What is the US supposed to do, prevent anyone from being exposed to this situation? That's a wide ranging / impossible mandate there.
Re: Evergrande teeters on edge of default as $148M payment falls due
#70Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's Lehman-like in that I don't think China will be bailing anyone out. It's not Lehman-like in that the company isn't a tangled octopus in the middle of the financial system. Lots of investors exposed to developing markets will get burned, but I don't think the knock-on effects will be huge.
I think the complicating factor is that the Chinese housing market is where the people of China attempt to have savings. A major housing market panic in China could create a lot of despair and unrest in China.
I really, really hope I'm wrong about that.