I think plausibly your cv, recommendations from people and credentials could be listed on a Blockchain and verified by your id tied to it, but: - I don’t see why you need NFTs - I don’t see how it’s better than e.g LinkedIn. Or maybe it could be the back end to LI’s front end It’s really a distributed way of storing your cv - how does that benefit your job search? One comment in the thread was that employers would se…
Linkedin is a walled garden. They make it really hard to use "their data" - the professional profiles of their users - outside their ecosystem, which makes sense as their business model optimises to sell Linkedin Recruiter Licences. The fact that professional identities live in a closed ecosystem prevents real innovation to happen on top of the network.
How NFTs will change hiring
61–65 of 65 posts
Re: How NFTs will change hiring
#62Re: How NFTs will change hiring
#63You'll learn and earn on-chain credentials
You’ll use your credentials to prove who you are, what your skills are and what people say about you
You can't hide from the blockchain ;)
How it will work:
- You apply for a job - It scans the blockchain and rates your set of on chain experiences and credentials - If above a certain rating, you’re hired within 60 seconds
No prejudice, no wasted time, no pain
This, to put it mildly, is simplifying the affair a bit. Whoever endures a lot of "quests, adventures and courses" on the internet in front of their computers may be a good candidate for e-sports or online gambling. Any person who has a moderately engaging life in the real world or is aged > 40 will, in this discipline, be put in by an army of nimble kids, otakus and net junkies. The idea that we can and should replace real-world interactions with "the cyber" and that this is a good idea for everyone is bonkers, yet—like "the blockchain" and the "OMG digitalization OMG must optimize this process quick OMG these people still work manually just think of the children OMG digitize digitize OMG the gainz OMG" meme—draws people in with its sweet smell like a rotting apple draws in fruit flies.
The other big thing here is of course that yeah, ok, once I have a number of credentials in my favor (on the blockchain whatever doesn't matter really) then it's a simple matter of 60 seconds to just look whether my rating is above a certain threshold and boom!—hired you are. If that's the case, if hiring someone is just about mechanically checking the boxes and do a sum over a few numbers, why should it take all of 60s to hire me? I want that job now you see, means now! I think the truth is rather that (1) you have to check and weigh different skillset combos against whatever you surmise might be advantageous for a given position, which is in itself difficult to get right, and then (2) square that with an assessment how a myriad of other factors might play out. I don't think it's a solved problem; I think there's a huge interest on the side of big-corporate employers to "optimize" the process (i.e. throw a computer at the wall and hope it sticks), not least to reduce costs in the HR dep. There's an incentive for the hoi polloi to buy into this, too, and since we now know how wide a base there is for believing in flat earth and injecting bleach, why not this?
Re: How NFTs will change hiring
#64Senior Oops Engineer @ReinH
Nov 5
a way you can use NFTs to improve hiring is you ask the candidate if they own any NFTs and if they say yes you don't hire them
Re: How NFTs will change hiring
#65The overwhelming consensus in this thread and in the replies to that tweet is dissent on the basis of the many completely obvious holes in the author's reasoning, which I won't get into here. What I'd like to appreciate is the uniqueness of the blockchain space in its seemingly bottomless capacity to generate these bold propositions for which blockchain is _blatantly_ ill-equipped to solve whatever problem is at hand…