Live data from Hacker News

Firecracker MicroVMs

firecracker-microvm.github.io

61–62 of 62 posts

Re: Firecracker MicroVMs

#61

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Directly from Docker image: https://github.com/combust-labs/firebuild#high-level-example . I’m the author.

This is incredibly interesting. Is it alright if I email you with some questions?

Sure. My email address: radek@gruchalski.com.

Re: Firecracker MicroVMs

#62
post #41

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Firecracker relies on KVM in the Linux kernel which relies on VT-x or similar. Offering VT-x inside a VM that's already using VT-x is called nested virtualization. EC2 VMs do not support nested virtualization, while others do. That said, it works fine on EC2 Bare Metal instances. (n.b., I work on the virtualization stack on Google Compute Engine)

Wouldn’t you want to run firecracker on bare metal anyways. Nested VMs come with a decent perf hit.

Thanks @jsolson for explaining

@bushbaba I wonder how large the percentage hit could be, if it's like 1% or 10%, if you happen to know

And how that percentage hit compares with gvisor performance wise

Post reply on HN