Live data from Hacker News

“Death” one of 5 ways to lose at Chess, according to PGN standard

saremba.de

61–70 of 115 posts

Re: “Death” one of 5 ways to lose at Chess, according to PGN standard

#61

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Pyric victory - technically you won but the resources you have to sacrifice (your imminent loss of freedom while in prison) make it not worth while.

It would certainly get your name in the history books and secure a legacy of infamy. A high ego grandmaster on the decline may decide loss of the remainder of their freedom in life is worth the sacrifice.

You have to be in a Stronger passion before your opponent died.

Re: “Death” one of 5 ways to lose at Chess, according to PGN standard

#62
post #43

"death": losing player called to greater things, one hopes. An inspiringly optimistic spiritual outlook from the PGN standard, so thank you for that. Technically, over the board one could just wait until their deceased opponent flags to claim a win, but in practice, for every occasion I'm aware of in high level tournament play, the remaining player will adjudicate the game honestly according to their evaluation of th…

I don't think that's too surprising, I doubt you can play chess at a high level with early stages of Alzheimer's.

Re: “Death” one of 5 ways to lose at Chess, according to PGN standard

#64
post #62
post #43

"death": losing player called to greater things, one hopes. An inspiringly optimistic spiritual outlook from the PGN standard, so thank you for that. Technically, over the board one could just wait until their deceased opponent flags to claim a win, but in practice, for every occasion I'm aware of in high level tournament play, the remaining player will adjudicate the game honestly according to their evaluation of th…

I don't think that's too surprising, I doubt you can play chess at a high level with early stages of Alzheimer's.

I think what they meant was that they’d never heard of someone who was at any point in time a high level chess player eventually succumbing to Alzheimer’s.

Re: “Death” one of 5 ways to lose at Chess, according to PGN standard

#65
post #15

Does this imply killing the opponent is a viable strategy in chess?

Not quite. There is also a "rules infraction" where failure to adhere to the laws of chess OR the event regulations can cause you to lose.

Murdering your opponent will almost definitely be considered a rule infraction.

Although there might be some edge cases if the murderer was an absolute ruler of the current country. Or maybe if you happened to kill your opponent in self defense somehow.

Re: “Death” one of 5 ways to lose at Chess, according to PGN standard

#67
post #7

And to think, I could have won all those matches I lost simply by killing my opponent.

Tennison gambit ICBM variation or Albin countergambit nuclear powered submarine variation? https://youtu.be/E2xNlzsnPCQ

Love that guy :D

Re: “Death” one of 5 ways to lose at Chess, according to PGN standard

#68

This occurred in a game of mine. I play(ed) international correspondence chess. The games can go on for years. In one of my games, my opponent sadly passed away. The game was adjuticated to a draw nine months after we had started. I did not have much personal connection with my opponent or interaction beyond our moves and an initial greeting, but it was obviously an extremely sad way for the game to end. Edit: the te…

Im not familiar with chess - why do some games last that long? Or was it multiple games?

Re: “Death” one of 5 ways to lose at Chess, according to PGN standard

#69
post #14

checkmate (n.) mid-14c., in chess, said of a king when it is in check and cannot escape it, from Old French eschec mat (Modern French échec et mat), which (with Spanish jaque y mate, Italian scacco-matto) is from Arabic shah mat "the king died" (see check (n.1)), which according to Barnhart is a misinterpretation of Persian mat "be astonished" as mata "to die," mat "he is dead." Hence Persian shah mat, if it is the u…

So it does mean that the chess assumes that the king is never “killed”? It always stood out to me as, what I assumed to be medieval code of conduct that required not killing kings (killing queens is ok)

Re: “Death” one of 5 ways to lose at Chess, according to PGN standard

#70
post #59

Please never show these rules to a general AI and ask it to win a chess match...

As an aside, would it be ethical to restrict an AGI to a single purpose? It sort of reminds me of Rick’s butter robot from Rick and Morty
Post reply on HN